This question
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
It is a response to an inquiry, not the answer to how evolving happens living naturally here as one of a kind. I understand why you evade the specificity of your chromosomes displaced uniquely here in this atmosphere regardless the longitude or latitude currently displaced.
Talk to @Vegas
Sorry, asshole. Not our responsibility to post links to prove your sources are ****. The same networks you keep pasting links from are the same ones that said Biden is sharper than ever. There's no credibility there. **** your propaganda machines.Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2025, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑ Why don't you two Imbeciles post a list of what you consider "credible sources"?
Blackvegetable » 27 Oct 2025, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ Another Signal scandal? Texts suggest Team Trump eyed 82nd Airborne for Portland
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-sho ... rcna235885
D.C. man sues after being detained for following National Guard around while playing 'Darth Vader's Theme'
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politi ... rcna239492
When ICE came for a U.S. citizen and Army veteran
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... n-citizen/
Remember the time Obama wore a tan suit in the WH?

Or run like a ******....it's coded in your rebel genes...SouthernFried » 28 Oct 2025, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑ Sorry, asshole. Not our responsibility to post links to prove your sources are ****. The same networks you keep pasting links from are the same ones that said Biden is sharper than ever. There's no credibility there. **** your propaganda machines.
Is this the "original thought" @Deezer Shoove is always going on about?nefarious101 » 28 Oct 2025, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑ Morning LGBT Dickhead....you can't seem to stay away from fake news sources
ok....let the LGBT Dickhead's fake outrage begin....today....just like he's done everyday for the last decade
it's not a real scandal if MSNBC NBC and WAPO are the links....it points more to being fake new and another TDS fueled, "We Got Him Now!" scam from the pedo-progressive LGBT Democrats
Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2025, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑ Or run like a ******....it's coded in your rebel genes...
Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2025, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ Is this the "original thought" @Deezer Shoove is always going on about?


If I've never answered a question, why are you so bitter?SouthernFried » 28 Oct 2025, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑ As if you have ever directly answered a question to any of your opposition on this forum..... lol
You're a **** joke.
Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2025, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ Is this the "original thought" @Deezer Shoove is always going on about?
@Buck Naked I am sure you know by now that Veghead is too cowardly to answer questions. Evasion is the most common tactic among narcissists. This is a win-win for me and a lose-lose for him. When he doesn't answer, then he proves my point that he evades incessantly. I win, he loses. If he ever does answer, he still needs to give a defense to his answer, which he can't, because he is clueless. I win, he loses.Blackvegetable » 27 Oct 2025, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Take it up with @Vegas ...
If you want to admit that @Vegas is a moron and therefore an unreliable source, I'll consider your request...
Where did you get the definition of survivorship bias in my own words?Vegas » 28 Oct 2025, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ @Buck Naked I am sure you know by now that Veghead is too cowardly to answer questions. Evasion is the most common tactic among narcissists. This is a win-win for me and a lose-lose for him. When he doesn't answer, then he proves my point that he evades incessantly. I win, he loses. If he ever does answer, he still needs to give a defense to his answer, which he can't, because he is clueless. I win, he loses.
Veghead, we both know what you will say next.
1. The pic...first time ...prove a negative.
2. You will lie and say you answered it. Refer to my usual predictions.
No, it isn't.BuckNaked » 28 Oct 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ I’m not this is your question to answer and I’ll keep axin
No I do not know thatVegas » 28 Oct 2025, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ @Buck Naked I am sure you know by now that Veghead is too cowardly to answer questions. Evasion is the most common tactic among narcissists. This is a win-win for me and a lose-lose for him. When he doesn't answer, then he proves my point that he evades incessantly. I win, he loses. If he ever does answer, he still needs to give a defense to his answer, which he can't, because he is clueless. I win, he loses.
Veghead, we both know what you will say next.
1. The pic...first time ...prove a negative.
2. You will lie and say you answered it. Refer to my usual predictions.
**** no I’m axin you to answer WTF overBlackvegetable » 28 Oct 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ No, it isn't.
It's @Vegas ' question.
Get him to answer it.
**** that.
Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ No, it isn't.
It's @Vegas ' question.
Get him to answer it.
Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2025, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑ Where did you get the definition of survivorship bias in my own words?
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.