Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2025, 7:32 am

Inside the billionaire network shaping MAGA’s post-Trump future

Chris Buskirk put tech elites at the center of power in Trump’s Washington. His efforts are grounded in a controversial theory — an “aristocracy” is needed to move the country forward.

Convened by Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel and JD Vance, then an investor who had written a best-selling memoir, the meeting included hedge fund heiress Rebekah Mercer, then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson and economist Oren Cass, according to two people familiar with the meeting. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the private gathering, details of which have not been previously reported.

But the person in the room who would solidify the group’s ambitions was decidedly lower profile: an Arizona insurance entrepreneur and conservative media figure named Chris Buskirk.

Do any of you **** rubes recall me pointing out the fundamental paradox of "Republican populism"?

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2025, 7:32 am

Do any of you **** rubes recall me pointing out the fundamental paradox of "Republican populism"?

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2025, 8:05 am

Me - #8, #13

You - "worst of the modern era", "2xWorse than Buchanan "

Good esne.

**** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2025, 8:10 am

Them....PhDs

You - "Next question."

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

roadkill » 04 Nov 2025, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2025, 11:29 am

Them...PhDs...on LSD.   Stumpy could never post who they are...other than their pictures.

   

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2025, 7:32 am

Inside the billionaire network shaping MAGA’s post-Trump future

Chris Buskirk put tech elites at the center of power in Trump’s Washington. His efforts are grounded in a controversial theory — an “aristocracy” is needed to move the country forward.

Convened by Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel and JD Vance, then an investor who had written a best-selling memoir, the meeting included hedge fund heiress Rebekah Mercer, then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson and economist Oren Cass, according to two people familiar with the meeting. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the private gathering, details of which have not been previously reported.

But the person in the room who would solidify the group’s ambitions was decidedly lower profile: an Arizona insurance entrepreneur and conservative media figure named Chris Buskirk.

Do any of you **** rubes recall me pointing out the fundamental paradox of "Republican populism"?

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 04 Nov 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2025, 11:36 am

He is one of the dumbest posters on the world wide web. he posts **** that backfires on him daily. For example, he blocked me because he needs to hide from that question I keep asking. However, now he can't see my question littering his PG thread and utterly trashing it. Thus, he cannot remove them.       

Just **** stupid.

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2025, 12:36 pm

Who the **** are you, Idiot? I should talk...I'm stump stupid.

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2025, 1:21 pm

Trump said on Truth Social SNAP benefits “will be given only when the Radical Left Democrats open up government, which they can easily do, and not before!” The statement comes after the U.S. Department of Agriculture said in a court statement Monday it would pay half of November’s SNAP benefits using contingency funding, though it warned some states won’t receive the funding for weeks or months.

  The agency made the statement in response to a federal judge ordering the Trump administration on Friday to begin issuing the payments.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2 ... urt-order/

"...cause he respekts da Konstatoooshun! Obama wuz a diktater!" 

MAGAts, and jill stein voting toadies, are so **** g'ddammned stupid.

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...