Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 09 Nov 2025, 10:16 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2025, 10:16 pm

   

Mrkelly » 08 Nov 2025, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2025, 9:53 am

can’t be according to you 

““Norway is not a socialist nation; it is a social democracy with a mixed-market capitalist economy.”

hey Dribbles...

Denmark the Happy Place on Earth according to pedo=progressive mythology just decided to embrace Trumpism

The are going to zero illegal migration and shipping their illegals to Rwanda...the rest of Europe will soon follow

you all produced another social engineering failure....good for you...helps with your political popularity 

Bad! Dribbles...Bad!

you can't have a worldwide political movement with LGBT ***, the mentally ill and social system parasites

nefarious101 » 10 Nov 2025, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2025, 8:16 am

hey Dribbles...

Denmark the Happy Place on Earth according to pedo=progressive mythology just decided to embrace Trumpism

The are going to zero illegal migration and shipping their illegals to Rwanda...the rest of Europe will soon follow

you all produced another social engineering failure....good for you...helps with your political popularity 

Bad! Dribbles...Bad!

you can't have a worldwide political movement with LGBT ***, the mentally ill and social system parasites

  Cute lil neffy 

BUTWHATABOUT MUCH?  
 

Cannonpointer » 09 Nov 2025, 9:26 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2025, 9:26 pm

In your opinion, how do his proposed policies differ from the policies in force today in San Francisco?

The distinction lies in the fact that policies in San Francisco are relevant to San Francisco, whereas policies in NYC are applicable to NYC.
 

Mrkelly » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

  Cute lil neffy 

BUTWHATABOUT MUCH?

Cute?

you're a *** Dribbles?

why would you call a grown man cute?


watch out people....dribbles is an LGBT'er

Roshambo » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

The distinction lies in the fact that policies in San Francisco are relevant to San Francisco, whereas policies in NYC are applicable to NYC.
 

So evolving is limited to personal location being alive by heartbeat in this atmosphere since date of conception, not birthday to learning how to stay in character come hell or high water?

nefarious101 » 10 Nov 2025, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2025, 8:27 am

Cute?

you're a *** Dribbles?

why would you call a grown man cute?

watch out people....dribbles is an LGBT'er

  I’ve always thought that lil children playing on their mommys phone are cute   

Mrkelly » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

  I’ve always thought that lil children playing on their mommys phone are cute 

sooo...you're a *** who fantasizes about little kids Dribbles?

why are you tell us that?


this **** is a sicko

*31stArrival » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

So evolving is limited to personal location being alive by heartbeat in this atmosphere since date of conception, not birthday to learning how to stay in character come hell or high water?

Yes
 

Roshambo » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Yes
 

Then why do you advocate for human rights to pretend life isn't self evident time living equally separated while genetically alive each rotation lived since conception?

You protect reasonable doubt suggesting intellect is a higher form of evolution evolving exceeds time adapting personally alive now.

Beekeeper » 10 Nov 2025, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2025, 7:31 am

Cannonpointer » 09 Nov 2025, 10:20 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2025, 10:20 pm

From your link:

Today, working people have few good options. In most political races, Americans will have the choice between far-right Republicans and corporate Democrats. In both cases, workers lose, and our politicians will remain controlled by their corporate donors, not the ordinary people who voted for them. Under this status quo, inequality will continue to worsen, corporations will continue to sell war and wreak havoc on the environment, and the worst impacts of these crises will be felt by the poor, people of color, and working people generally. But we as working people should have power over our lives, and that includes a government and economy by and for the working class.

Neither major party is capable of advancing a positive program that meets the needs of the majority of Americans. That’s why the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is presenting a bold alternative course of action. In our 2025-2026 program, “Workers Deserve More,” we hope to bring together millions of people throughout the U.S. to fight for a true democracy where working people have control over their own lives, their government, and the economy. We deserve more, and we have to fight like hell to make that vision a reality.

Do us all a favor and shred that. ^ Tell us what is wrong with it. Which part do you disagree with, and why?

More of that DSA LIPSTICK on that PIG!!

You seem to love that part, huh.

Psssssssst, our FOUNDERS did not like, love or create a DEMOCRACY, ASSHOLE!! They created a Constitutional Representative Republican Confederation. Because 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner doesn't work out so well for that SHEEP=AKA YOU, that "worker"!! And that is what the DSA is talking about, MORON!!

Please, educated yourself before you spew a bunch of bloviating ****!!

So that is a no, then? You CANNOT shred that position statement from your link?

Okay, thank you.

Now, let me educate you. I do not live in new york, and I do not give a **** what new yorkers vote for. I DO care that the new york election is likely a fraud - an appointment rather than an honest election. And I strongly suspect it is the tiny hats who did the fixing. They put in a shmoe they can control and neuter in order to implement a "solution" to a "problem" THEY created for the express purpose of using that "problem" to get what they want.

I could be wrong, of course. It happened in 1972, and it can happen again.

Roshambo » 10 Nov 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2025, 8:20 am

The distinction lies in the fact that policies in San Francisco are relevant to San Francisco, whereas policies in NYC are applicable to NYC.

So it is your response that other than geography, there is no difference between the **** mamdani wants to implement in NY, and the **** that is destroying SF?

Is that your final answer?
 

Cannonpointer » 10 Nov 2025, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2025, 8:55 am

So that is a no, then? You CANNOT shred that position statement from your link?

Okay, thank you.

Now, let me educate you. I do not live in new york, and I do not give a **** what new yorkers vote for. I DO care that the new york election is likely a fraud - an appointment rather than an honest election. And I strongly suspect it is the tiny hats who did the fixing. They put in a shmoe they can control and neuter in order to implement a "solution" to a "problem" THEY created for the express purpose of using that "problem" to get what they want.

I could be wrong, of course. It happened in 1972, and it can happen again.

Seems we see things differently. I fully responded to your diatribe of **** that the DSA is using to "sell" people with RATHER than tell people what they REALLY are all about. It's called "lipstick on a pig" and too bad you are unable to comprehend that analogy. Then again, no one ever said you were very smart.

Too bad you hate JEWS so much you can't fathom that it wasn't them that elected the SOCIALIST JEW HATER!!

You obviously didn't get that memo.

Cannonpointer » 10 Nov 2025, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2025, 8:57 am

So it is your response that other than geography, there is no difference between the **** mamdani wants to implement in NY, and the **** that is destroying SF?

Is that your final answer?

Yes
 

Roshambo » 05 Nov 2025, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2025, 8:53 am

If the largest city in the United States begins to thrive, what justification can we provide to account for this?

Wait, wait!
Before you go any further out on that limb, would you mind telling us which programs he specified that you truly believe will come to pass under Mamdani?

Success of government-run grocery stores?
Free travel on NYC buses?
Affordable housing for all?
Free child care for all?
Huge new taxes on the wealthy and corporations, which Gov. Hochul has already said is not going to happen?
Defunding the police in favor of a Dept. of Community Safety?

You MAY get a rent freeze on NYC apartments, but do you recall what happened the last time that was tried under Comrade
de Blasio?  Landlords owning those apartments stopped maintaining them for lack of funds and their quality deteriorated drastically, while some landlords gave up and abandoned their buildings entirely.  Other non-stabilized apartments in the same buildings saw their rent skyrocket to make up the difference in most cases.  And eventually, the Rent Guidelines Board began approving rent hikes again as those problems became wide-spread.

But apparently, that failure didn't teach you OR Mamdani anything, did it?  How many Democrat idiots do you think believed this would also freeze THEIR rent, despite that it could only be done with rent stabilized apartments and not theirs which are guaranteed to rise even more?  And landlords kept tens of thousands of apartments "vacant but not for rent" off the market because the repairs required would not have been worth doing for the small amount of rent they were permitted to receive for them.

Do YOU live in NYC, Roshambo?
Because I'd LOVE to see regular updates from residents in the coming months of how bad it's going to get as a result of the imbecilic socialist voters you have in abundance there!    
 

Zeets2 » 10 Nov 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2025, 2:25 pm

Wait, wait!
Before you go any further out on that limb, would you mind telling us which programs he specified that you truly believe will come to pass under Mamdani?

Success of government-run grocery stores?
Free travel on NYC buses?
Affordable housing for all?
Free child care for all?
Huge new taxes on the wealthy and corporations, which Gov. Hochul has already said is not going to happen?
Defunding the police in favor of a Dept. of Community Safety?

You MAY get a rent freeze on NYC apartments, but do you recall what happened the last time that was tried under Comrade
de Blasio?  Landlords owning those apartments stopped maintaining them for lack of funds and their quality deteriorated drastically, while some landlords gave up and abandoned their buildings entirely.  Other non-stabilized apartments in the same buildings saw their rent skyrocket to make up the difference in most cases.  And eventually, the Rent Guidelines Board began approving rent hikes again as those problems became wide-spread.

But apparently, that failure didn't teach you OR Mamdani anything, did it?  How many Democrat idiots do you think believed this would also freeze THEIR rent, despite that it could only be done with rent stabilized apartments and not theirs which are guaranteed to rise even more?  And landlords kept tens of thousands of apartments "vacant but not for rent" off the market because the repairs required would not have been worth doing for the small amount of rent they were permitted to receive for them.

Do YOU live in NYC, Roshambo?
Because I'd LOVE to see regular updates from residents in the coming months of how bad it's going to get as a result of the imbecilic socialist voters you have in abundance there!  

What part do you not understand? The I or the F ? 
You are PRIUS stupid. You are gay. You proved it over and over. 
 
Yes you are all of the above and @Cannon Pointer  knows it as well.
 
 
 

Roshambo » 10 Nov 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2025, 2:30 pm

What part do you not understand? The I or the F ? 
You are PRIUS stupid. You are gay. You proved it over and over. 
 
Yes you are all of the above and @Cannon Pointer  knows it as well.

Care to explain THAT burst of stupidity?
I wouldn't take a Prius if it was handed to me for free!  Just as your homo friend CP.
And I've been happily married to the love of my life for over 42 years.

Now, what the hell is "the I or the F"?
And why are you SO afraid to answer the very simple questions I posed?
 

Zeets2 » 10 Nov 2025, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2025, 2:38 pm

Care to explain THAT burst of stupidity?
I wouldn't take a Prius if it was handed to me for free!  Just as your homo friend CP.
And I've been happily married to the love of my life for over 42 years.

Now, what the hell is "the I or the F"?
And why are you SO afraid to answer the very simple questions I posed?

Roshambo » 05 Nov 2025, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2025, 8:53 am

If the largest city in the United States begins to thrive, what justification can we provide to account for this?

Roshambo » 10 Nov 2025, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2025, 4:44 pm

 

You're obviously counting heavily on something that's never happened before in history, with dozens of examples of it being a colossal failure, and yet you're still SO certain that THIS time, it will work, huh?

OK, I'll bite!
If these promises make NYC thrive, I'll admit that communism works, OK?

And if these are the results, will YOU admit that it has failed?

1) Wealthy individuals will flee the high taxes, fees, and regulations that Mamdani puts on the city.
2) Businesses will close and those that don't go broke will also flee the city taking thousands of jobs with them.
3) Unemployment will rise
4) Those "government-run grocery stores" will have virtually empty shelves except for a few items, some with expiration dates that have long passed
5) Free city buses will be dangerous havens for drug dealers, the homeless, and various criminals robbing the poor.
6) Crime will skyrocket after police funding is reduced in favor of the Dept. of Community Safety
7) A small percentage of apartments will freeze rents while the majority will rise even faster as landlords abandon their buildings because the cost of repairs they're required to do outweigh the rent received and the housing crisis will get much worse.

Your prognosis?

Roshambo » 05 Nov 2025, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2025, 8:53 am

If the largest city in the United States begins to thrive, what justification can we provide to account for this?

That more WHITE people were involved in the decision-making process.