The WHITE people had 40 years to address the problem.MR-7 » 10 Nov 2025, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ That more WHITE people were involved in the decision-making process.
IDGAF either way. I have no interest in visiting NY or NYC.Zeets2 » 10 Nov 2025, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑ You're obviously counting heavily on something that's never happened before in history, with dozens of examples of it being a colossal failure, and yet you're still SO certain that THIS time, it will work, huh?
OK, I'll bite!
If these promises make NYC thrive, I'll admit that communism works, OK?
And if these are the results, will YOU admit that it has failed?
1) Wealthy individuals will flee the high taxes, fees, and regulations that Mamdani puts on the city.
2) Businesses will close and those that don't go broke will also flee the city taking thousands of jobs with them.
3) Unemployment will rise
4) Those "government-run grocery stores" will have virtually empty shelves except for a few items, some with expiration dates that have long passed
5) Free city buses will be dangerous havens for drug dealers, the homeless, and various criminals robbing the poor.
6) Crime will skyrocket after police funding is reduced in favor of the Dept. of Community Safety
7) A small percentage of apartments will freeze rents while the majority will rise even faster as landlords abandon their buildings because the cost of repairs they're required to do outweigh the rent received and the housing crisis will get much worse.
Your prognosis?
New York has consistently voted Democratic in presidential elections since 1988—nearly 40 years. It’s considered a solid “blue state” in modern U.S. politics......dems have put you Low IQ MoFo's where you are today. And every post you share is proof of what I am saying.Roshambo » 10 Nov 2025, 5:11 pm » wrote: ↑ The WHITE people had 40 years to address the problem.![]()
The WHITE people are the problem.
You made it about RACE, not political affiliation.MR-7 » 10 Nov 2025, 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑ New York has consistently voted Democratic in presidential elections since 1988—nearly 40 years. It’s considered a solid “blue state” in modern U.S. politics......dems have put you Low IQ MoFo's where you are today. And every post you share is proof of what I am saying.

Here's a novel idea....prove my statement "That more WHITE people were involved in the decision-making process" is not true.Roshambo » 10 Nov 2025, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You made it about RACE, not political affiliation.
WHITE people are Obviously the problem![]()
Post your IQ ****
It hasn't happened. You really are one dumb ****MR-7 » 10 Nov 2025, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Here's a novel idea....prove my statement "That more WHITE people were involved in the decision-making process" is not true.
Roshambo » 05 Nov 2025, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ If the largest city in the United States begins to thrive, what justification can we provide to account for this?
MR-7 » 10 Nov 2025, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ That more WHITE people were involved in the decision-making process.
Of course it hasn't happened you Slack-Jawed “imbecile”. Your whole idea that it could even "possibly happen" is absurd. Here’s a current visual snapshot of African slum areas in 2025—highlighting informal settlements, urban density, and the challenges of rapid growth. These images reflect life in places like Kibera (Kenya), Makoko (Nigeria), and other densely populated zones across sub-Saharan Africa.
That is generally the case.
No.Beekeeper » 10 Nov 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑I fully responded to your diatribe of **** that the DSA is using to "sell" people with RATHER than tell people what they REALLY are all about.
Oh, I can comprehend the analogy. It's like when your wife puts on her makeup.Beekeeper » 10 Nov 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑It's called "lipstick on a pig" and too bad you are unable to comprehend that analogy. Then again, no one ever said you were very smart.
I never said they elected him. You're stupid.Beekeeper » 10 Nov 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Too bad you hate JEWS so much you can't fathom that it wasn't them that elected the SOCIALIST JEW HATER!!
That would call for you to defend the policies currently in effect in SF.
Did you know that people that choose contextual possibilities over their own chromosomes denounce their own ancestry cradle to grave socially until extinction happens?Roshambo » 10 Nov 2025, 5:11 pm » wrote: ↑ The WHITE people had 40 years to address the problem. :\
The WHITE people are the problem.
I know I do. I have denounced over half my ancestry. They're worthless little ****, and I have no need for them.*31stArrival » 11 Nov 2025, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ Did you know that people that choose contextual possibilities over their own chromosomes denounce their own ancestry cradle to grave socially until extinction happens?
What you been since conceived will never be who you became in context over chromosomes.MR-7 » 11 Nov 2025, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ I know I do. I have denounced over half my ancestry. They're worthless little ****, and I have no need for them.
Frankly, I have no concern for cities or states that I do not intend to visit or have any interest in exploring.Cannonpointer » 10 Nov 2025, 8:57 pm » wrote: ↑ That would call for you to defend the policies currently in effect in SF.
That would be interesting.
Wonk it to us.
The white officials missed their opportunity, the populace expressed their opinion, and Mamdani was chosen.MR-7 » 10 Nov 2025, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course it hasn't happened you Slack-Jawed “imbecile”. Your whole idea that it could even "possibly happen" is absurd. Here’s a current visual snapshot of African slum areas in 2025—highlighting informal settlements, urban density, and the challenges of rapid growth. These images reflect life in places like Kibera (Kenya), Makoko (Nigeria), and other densely populated zones across sub-Saharan Africa.
Do you believe any "White" people are running things there?
Instinctive situational awareness to global current events when your body only exits when adapting in space adapting with life eternally separating your time living with each heartbeat forward, now.Roshambo » 11 Nov 2025, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ Frankly, I have no concern for cities or states that I do not intend to visit or have any interest in exploring.
What, and miss how NYC is going to "thrive" under Mamdani as you claim??!?Roshambo » 10 Nov 2025, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑ IDGAF either way. I have no interest in visiting NY or NYC.
If you don't give a ****, or have no interest, then why would you ask this question?Roshambo » 10 Nov 2025, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑ IDGAF either way. I have no interest in visiting NY or NYC.
I am interested in understanding what your justification will be.MR-7 » 11 Nov 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ If you don't give a ****, or have no interest, then why would you ask this question?
viewtopic.php?p=2813055#p2813055
I've already told you what it is.Roshambo » 11 Nov 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ I am interested in understanding what your justification will be.
I tend to agree. But being an adult, I would never support policies that I can see failing in real time.Roshambo » 11 Nov 2025, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ Frankly, I have no concern for cities or states that I do not intend to visit or have any interest in exploring.