Liberal Forum

Lone Vet Drops 3 Armed Home Invaders with Head/Chest Shots—

Dead Thug’s Mom Defends Son with Logic That Will Lead to More Break-Ins!​

 www.usasupreme.com
14 Nov 2025 ~~ By George Rowe

In a story that’s got self-defense advocates cheering and the radical left fuming, a lone veteran in his home faced down three armed intruders—and dropped all three with precise head and chest shots, ending the threat in seconds. The November 12, 2025, incident, captured on video that’s gone viral, shows the vet’s calm resolve as he protected his life from the break-in crew. But the real jaw-dropper? The mother of one dead thug defending her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him. “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,” she ranted, flipping victim and villain in a logic twist that could encourage more crime.
Video:
https://www.usasupreme.com/wp-content/u ... nd.mp4?_=1
~Snip~
Her logic? Dangerous—if robbing isn’t a death-warrant risk, more thugs will try. This is why Second Amendment rights matter—Trump’s pushed concealed carry reciprocity, ensuring good guys win. The vet’s a hero; charge him? That’s the real injustice.
The image of her furious face says it all—entitlement meets reality.
Commentary:
An elderly White guy, Black robbers.
I am really tired of this story. It did have a happy ending though, at least for chapter 1.
Chapter 2 often has the civil suits.
The mother of one dead thug defends her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him.
That works for me. Case dismissed.
Dead perpetrators. Caught on video doing a break-in and attempted armed robbery. No charges filed against the defender.
A "Baby Mother's" logic, “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,” 
Where's attorney Ben Crump? Maybe he can squeeze something out of this. 
Except for the fact they forced their way into the house and were armed.
On the other hand maybe the survivor of the attack should sue he for rearing a hard-core criminal and THEN defending his crime.
From my view, that was some good shooting on his part. Head and body mass shots on all three.
This should be a lesson to all criminal thug skels and punks like this. You never know if there is a veteran behind that door who has been trained to fight inside buildings with weapons! Veterans don’t shoot to wound we shoot until the target stops moving!
 

A win for self defense and the 2nd Amendment.

Huey » 15 Nov 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2025, 11:22 am

A win for self defense and the 2nd Amendment.

Good thread...but it will only confuse the left.     

roadkill » 15 Nov 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2025, 11:33 am

Huey » 15 Nov 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2025, 11:22 am

A win for self defense and the 2nd Amendment.

Good thread...but it will only confuse the left.     

 

Only the anti gun left would not understand three thugs with at least one gun, forcing their way into a home, should be dropped as the were.

Huey » 15 Nov 2025, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2025, 11:37 am

Only the anti gun left would not understand three thugs with at least one gun, forcing their way into a home, should be dropped as the were.

I guess leftists think inmates are captive whales as they chant "Free Willy".

I know how it works. When I go fishing I usually hook the big ones. Then the chicks started gathering behind  me and cheering me on.  When I get close to landing the monster the chicks change their tune and start chanting...

"Free Willy"   Honest Huey.    

 
 

We don't have to live like this...

this was created and it can be uncreated

too worried about people's feelings if we do something about it

result....a tremendous savings of taxpayer money...**** their feelings!

Huey » 15 Nov 2025, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2025, 11:21 am

Lone Vet Drops 3 Armed Home Invaders with Head/Chest Shots—

Dead Thug’s Mom Defends Son with Logic That Will Lead to More Break-Ins!​

 www.usasupreme.com
14 Nov 2025 ~~ By George Rowe

In a story that’s got self-defense advocates cheering and the radical left fuming, a lone veteran in his home faced down three armed intruders—and dropped all three with precise head and chest shots, ending the threat in seconds. The November 12, 2025, incident, captured on video that’s gone viral, shows the vet’s calm resolve as he protected his life from the break-in crew. But the real jaw-dropper? The mother of one dead thug defending her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him. “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,” she ranted, flipping victim and villain in a logic twist that could encourage more crime.
Video:
https://www.usasupreme.com/wp-content/u ... nd.mp4?_=1
~Snip~
Her logic? Dangerous—if robbing isn’t a death-warrant risk, more thugs will try. This is why Second Amendment rights matter—Trump’s pushed concealed carry reciprocity, ensuring good guys win. The vet’s a hero; charge him? That’s the real injustice.
The image of her furious face says it all—entitlement meets reality.
Commentary:
An elderly White guy, Black robbers.
I am really tired of this story. It did have a happy ending though, at least for chapter 1.
Chapter 2 often has the civil suits.
The mother of one dead thug defends her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him.
That works for me. Case dismissed.
Dead perpetrators. Caught on video doing a break-in and attempted armed robbery. No charges filed against the defender.
A "Baby Mother's" logic, “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,” 
Where's attorney Ben Crump? Maybe he can squeeze something out of this. 
Except for the fact they forced their way into the house and were armed.
On the other hand maybe the survivor of the attack should sue he for rearing a hard-core criminal and THEN defending his crime.
From my view, that was some good shooting on his part. Head and body mass shots on all three.
This should be a lesson to all criminal thug skels and punks like this. You never know if there is a veteran behind that door who has been trained to fight inside buildings with weapons! Veterans don’t shoot to wound we shoot until the target stops moving!

A classic FAFO...albeit with those kill shots, it sounds like a professional hitman...especially if the chests were double tapped...        

roadkill » 15 Nov 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2025, 12:23 pm

I guess leftists think inmates are captive whales as they chant "Free Willy".

I know how it works. When I go fishing I usually hook the big ones. Then the chicks started gathering behind  me and cheering me on.  When I get close to landing the monster the chicks change their tune and start chanting...

"Free Willy"   Honest Huey.  

So you pulled out your pecker then?     
 

Huey » 15 Nov 2025, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2025, 11:21 am

Lone Vet Drops 3 Armed Home Invaders with Head/Chest Shots—

Dead Thug’s Mom Defends Son with Logic That Will Lead to More Break-Ins!​

 www.usasupreme.com
14 Nov 2025 ~~ By George Rowe

In a story that’s got self-defense advocates cheering and the radical left fuming, a lone veteran in his home faced down three armed intruders—and dropped all three with precise head and chest shots, ending the threat in seconds. The November 12, 2025, incident, captured on video that’s gone viral, shows the vet’s calm resolve as he protected his life from the break-in crew. But the real jaw-dropper? The mother of one dead thug defending her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him. “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,” she ranted, flipping victim and villain in a logic twist that could encourage more crime.
Video:
https://www.usasupreme.com/wp-content/u ... nd.mp4?_=1
~Snip~
Her logic? Dangerous—if robbing isn’t a death-warrant risk, more thugs will try. This is why Second Amendment rights matter—Trump’s pushed concealed carry reciprocity, ensuring good guys win. The vet’s a hero; charge him? That’s the real injustice.
The image of her furious face says it all—entitlement meets reality.
Commentary:
An elderly White guy, Black robbers.
I am really tired of this story. It did have a happy ending though, at least for chapter 1.
Chapter 2 often has the civil suits.
The mother of one dead thug defends her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him.
That works for me. Case dismissed.
Dead perpetrators. Caught on video doing a break-in and attempted armed robbery. No charges filed against the defender.
A "Baby Mother's" logic, “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,” 
Where's attorney Ben Crump? Maybe he can squeeze something out of this. 
Except for the fact they forced their way into the house and were armed.
On the other hand maybe the survivor of the attack should sue he for rearing a hard-core criminal and THEN defending his crime.
From my view, that was some good shooting on his part. Head and body mass shots on all three.
This should be a lesson to all criminal thug skels and punks like this. You never know if there is a veteran behind that door who has been trained to fight inside buildings with weapons! Veterans don’t shoot to wound we shoot until the target stops moving!

NOW mommy notices she had a "son"?
Where daddy be? Sheboon doesn't even know that piece of ****'s name...

I'm glad they're dead. Their future was early death anyway.

FAFO Huray for whitey.

ROG62 » 15 Nov 2025, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2025, 6:21 pm

So you pulled out your pecker then?   

 

28 hits to three perps? Wow that’s a lot

BuckNaked » 16 Nov 2025, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

16 Nov 2025, 9:15 am

28 hits to three perps? Wow that’s a lot

He would have shot them more, but reloading at that point seems useless.  LOL

https://youtu.be/BFDs4Yo9J3U?si=1_O60wN1SlU3tlRT
'His family and his property': Madera jeweler defends shop, family from armed robbers

 

Huey » 15 Nov 2025, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2025, 11:21 am

Lone Vet Drops 3 Armed Home Invaders with Head/Chest Shots—

Dead Thug’s Mom Defends Son with Logic That Will Lead to More Break-Ins!​

 www.usasupreme.com
14 Nov 2025 ~~ By George Rowe

In a story that’s got self-defense advocates cheering and the radical left fuming, a lone veteran in his home faced down three armed intruders—and dropped all three with precise head and chest shots, ending the threat in seconds. The November 12, 2025, incident, captured on video that’s gone viral, shows the vet’s calm resolve as he protected his life from the break-in crew. But the real jaw-dropper? The mother of one dead thug defending her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him. “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,” she ranted, flipping victim and villain in a logic twist that could encourage more crime.
Video:
https://www.usasupreme.com/wp-content/u ... nd.mp4?_=1
~Snip~
Her logic? Dangerous—if robbing isn’t a death-warrant risk, more thugs will try. This is why Second Amendment rights matter—Trump’s pushed concealed carry reciprocity, ensuring good guys win. The vet’s a hero; charge him? That’s the real injustice.
The image of her furious face says it all—entitlement meets reality.
Commentary:
An elderly White guy, Black robbers.
I am really tired of this story. It did have a happy ending though, at least for chapter 1.
Chapter 2 often has the civil suits.
The mother of one dead thug defends her son, claiming the vet used “excessive force” because they “only tried to rob” him.
That works for me. Case dismissed.
Dead perpetrators. Caught on video doing a break-in and attempted armed robbery. No charges filed against the defender.
A "Baby Mother's" logic, “My son only tried to rob you, and you took his life—that was an abuse of force, YOU must pay for this,” 
Where's attorney Ben Crump? Maybe he can squeeze something out of this. 
Except for the fact they forced their way into the house and were armed.
On the other hand maybe the survivor of the attack should sue he for rearing a hard-core criminal and THEN defending his crime.
From my view, that was some good shooting on his part. Head and body mass shots on all three.
This should be a lesson to all criminal thug skels and punks like this. You never know if there is a veteran behind that door who has been trained to fight inside buildings with weapons! Veterans don’t shoot to wound we shoot until the target stops moving!

He had a duty toretreat to his own home before using deadly force.

Wait, let me read the whole article...
 

Cannonpointer » 16 Nov 2025, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Nov 2025, 7:41 pm

He had a duty toretreat to his own home before using deadly force.

Wait, let me read the whole article...

wasn’t he inside standing his ground?

BuckNaked » 17 Nov 2025, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2025, 9:15 am

wasn’t he inside standing his ground?

No.

He tracked them to their homes and killed them in front of their parents.

Well, PARENT, singular. Where a nigga gonna git a daddy?
 

Cannonpointer » 17 Nov 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2025, 11:13 am

No.

He tracked them to their homes and killed them in front of their parents.

Well, PARENT, singular. Where a nigga gonna git a daddy?

That’s not what the article states……..
lone veteran in his home faced down three armed intruders—and dropped all three with precise head and chest shots, ending the threat in seconds

 

BuckNaked » 17 Nov 2025, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2025, 12:42 pm

That’s not what the article states……..
lone veteran in his home faced down three armed intruders—and dropped all three with precise head and chest shots, ending the threat in seconds

Can't slip NUTHIN past you, Mensa. 
 

Cannonpointer » 18 Nov 2025, 12:18 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2025, 12:18 am

Can't slip NUTHIN past you, Mensa.

I try