Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 7:34 am

Trump Loyalist Admits Grand Jury Never Saw Final Comey Indictment

Grand jurors have to vote on indictments to approve them, but a prosecutor told the judge in the case that only the foreperson formally approved the second charging document, a move that could cripple the case.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/19/us/p ... trump.html

Staggering corruption leveraged with incomprehensible ineptitude.

RebelGator » 20 Nov 2025, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 7:37 am

Clerical error......same excuse the Democrats used in the 2020 vote count.

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 7:40 am

You should have gatored...

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

ROG62 » 20 Nov 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 8:41 am

more hoodspeak, tiny feet? guess you had to be there, eh?

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 7:34 am

Trump Loyalist Admits Grand Jury Never Saw Final Comey Indictment

Grand jurors have to vote on indictments to approve them, but a prosecutor told the judge in the case that only the foreperson formally approved the second charging document, a move that could cripple the case.


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/19/us/p ... trump.html


Staggering corruption leveraged with incomprehensible ineptitude.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 7:34 am

Trump Loyalist Admits Grand Jury Never Saw Final Comey Indictment

Grand jurors have to vote on indictments to approve them, but a prosecutor told the judge in the case that only the foreperson formally approved the second charging document, a move that could cripple the case.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/19/us/p ... trump.html

Staggering corruption leveraged with incomprehensible ineptitude.

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 9:27 am

Non sequitur.....

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

ROG62 » 20 Nov 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 10:13 am

^^^ po po tiny feet...no thoughts...

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 10:49 am

You put a lot of thought into that....

Have none of your MAGAts been told what to say about it?

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 11:15 am

Is this

viewtopic.php?p=2816833#p2816833

worth reading?

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 7:34 am

Trump Loyalist Admits Grand Jury Never Saw Final Comey Indictment

Grand jurors have to vote on indictments to approve them, but a prosecutor told the judge in the case that only the foreperson formally approved the second charging document, a move that could cripple the case.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/19/us/p ... trump.html

Staggering corruption leveraged with incomprehensible ineptitude.

nefarious101 » 20 Nov 2025, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 4:46 pm

Hey LGBT Dickhead....

The NYTimes was front and center pushing the Russia Russia Russia hoax for years

are you saying they aren't lying now?

you said that then and they were

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 10:49 am

You put a lot of thought into that....

Have none of your MAGAts been told what to say about it?

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

ROG62 » 20 Nov 2025, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 5:34 pm

Unlike you, brown, we don't lick boots...

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 5:36 pm

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

ROG62 » 20 Nov 2025, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 8:22 pm

cool...now brown, what's this got to do with bootlickers?

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 10:13 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 10:13 pm

He makes those, certain that you bootspittles will buy them.

**** idiot.

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."