Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
So, Idiots....What's The Gutfeld Spin On This?
So, Idiots....What's The Gutfeld Spin On This?
By Blackvegetable
20 Nov 2025 6:34 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
21 Nov 2025 5:36 am
NYT.....MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑ Who's the **** Idiot, BV?
Grand jury properly voted on James Comey’s indictment, foreman claims in blow to defense: ‘Eliminates any doubt’
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
21 Nov 2025 5:40 am
Always debating possibilities and never discussing self evident results evolving as specifically evolving into current events unfolding the total sum past events reached today, never same individual details twice, so far.Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑ Trump Loyalist Admits Grand Jury Never Saw Final Comey Indictment
Grand jurors have to vote on indictments to approve them, but a prosecutor told the judge in the case that only the foreperson formally approved the second charging document, a move that could cripple the case.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/19/us/p ... trump.html
Staggering corruption leveraged with incomprehensible ineptitude.
Everything universally present is eroding or decomposing what has evolved so far while evolving balances out forms shaped here now.
21 Nov 2025 5:53 am
you have to be a SLACK JAWED mother **** to pay a subscription to read the fake articles NYT writes. Any other SJ's on here besides BV?
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
21 Nov 2025 5:53 am
Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑ Trump Loyalist Admits Grand Jury Never Saw Final Comey Indictment
Grand jurors have to vote on indictments to approve them, but a prosecutor told the judge in the case that only the foreperson formally approved the second charging document, a move that could cripple the case.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/19/us/p ... trump.html
Staggering corruption leveraged with incomprehensible ineptitude.
You're a **** TDS FILLED IDIOT!! Seems that ALL THE **** you bring from the NY SLIMES is FULLY REFUTED THE NEXT DAY!!
Imagine the **** our of that, MORON!!
WASHINGTON — A federal grand jury properly voted on the indictment of ex-FBI boss James Comey in September after prosecutors mistakenly told a judge that not all jurors saw the final version of the charges, according to a new court transcript.
Interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan submitted the transcript the day after a tense hearing in Alexandria, Va., on Wednesday, during which she had indicated only “the foreperson and another grand juror” handed up the indictment to US Magistrate Judge Lindsey Vaala.
But a court filing from the US Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Virginia on Thursday noted the transcript of the Sept. 25 proceeding before Vaala “conclusively refutes” that there was an issue with the process “and establishes that the grand jury voted on — and true-billed — the two-count indictment.”
“[A]ny assertion that the grand jury ‘never voted on the two-count indictment’ is contradicted by the official transcript,” Halligan’s team responded in the new court papers — directly contradicting claims from Comey’s defense team in court that the charges were void.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
21 Nov 2025 6:18 am
@Roshambo how many subscriptions do you have?MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑ you have to be a SLACK JAWED mother **** to pay a subscription to read the fake articles NYT writes. Any other SJ's on here besides BV?
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
21 Nov 2025 6:33 am
@LowIQTrash Do you have a subscription? Oh, and how about @jerra b and @Mrkelly ...do you slack Jaws have one?MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑ you have to be a SLACK JAWED mother **** to pay a subscription to read the fake articles NYT writes. Any other SJ's on here besides BV?
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
21 Nov 2025 6:47 am
You're a **** idiot.ROG62 » 21 Nov 2025, 1:09 am » wrote: ↑ funny thing, ****, you're the only one who knows anything about them...
gd'damn man, I can't imagine the beatings you took as a kid...my condolences to your birth mother...
https://collecttrumpcards.com/
21 Nov 2025 7:01 am
0
End your misery
chase me
fried
I live rent free in your mind
friedI live rent free in your mind
21 Nov 2025 7:06 am
https://i.postimg.cc/029NCTDr/prize.jpg
chase me
fried
I live rent free in your mind
friedI live rent free in your mind
21 Nov 2025 7:09 am
What a failed thread, as usual.
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
21 Nov 2025 7:17 am
The New York Times has a long record of publishing stories later proven false or misleading, from the Russian Revolution to the Iraq War and recent Gaza coverage. While it does sometimes, issue corrections, the damage is often already done, reinforcing perceptions of bias and unreliability.
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
21 Nov 2025 7:30 am
Post your sources.MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ The New York Times has a long record of publishing stories later proven false or misleading, from the Russian Revolution to the Iraq War and recent Gaza coverage. While it does sometimes, issue corrections, the damage is often already done, reinforcing perceptions of bias and unreliability.
21 Nov 2025 7:31 am
Why are you challenging people with what they READ, Slack jaw?MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ @LowIQTrash Do you have a subscription? Oh, and how about @jerra b and @Mrkelly ...do you slack Jaws have one?
21 Nov 2025 8:13 am
Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ Why are you challenging people with what they READ, Slack jaw?
WHY do yoy IGNORE the REFUTATION OF YOUR **** PIECE??? The COURT TRANSCRIPT PROVES YOUR "article" IS A **** **** HIT PIECE!!
A TOTAL **** ARTICLE AND PROVEN TO BE NOTHING BUT WHAT IT IS- ****!!
Run.
Now, you have *** KICKING #2 already today!! I bet that really sucks, huh, DICKBREATH??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
21 Nov 2025 8:29 am
List of The New York Times controversies - Wikipedia
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/nyt-lies-gaza-dies-protesters-vandalize-iconic-new-york-times-headquarters-over-controversial-article/articleshow/123022748.cms
https://www.nytco.com/press/tracking-misinformation-false-claims-about-times-reporting/
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
21 Nov 2025 8:32 am
Don't be a dumb piece of ****.....I know you post AI crap.MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑ List of The New York Times controversies - Wikipedia
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/nyt-lies-gaza-dies-protesters-vandalize-iconic-new-york-times-headquarters-over-controversial-article/articleshow/123022748.cms
https://www.nytco.com/press/tracking-misinformation-false-claims-about-times-reporting/
This is about where you spend your time "informing" yourself.
21 Nov 2025 8:33 am
Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Don't be a dumb piece of ****.....I know you post AI crap.
This is about where you spend your time "informing" yourself.
YET YOU CAN'T DEFINE THE TERM WOMAN
21 Nov 2025 8:34 am
There's no "refutation", Clown.Beekeeper » 21 Nov 2025, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ WHY do yoy IGNORE the REFUTATION OF YOUR **** PIECE??? The COURT TRANSCRIPT PROVES YOUR "article" IS A **** **** HIT PIECE!!
A TOTAL **** ARTICLE AND PROVEN TO BE NOTHING BUT WHAT IT IS- ****!!
Run.
Now, you have *** KICKING #2 already today!! I bet that really sucks, huh, DICKBREATH??
21 Nov 2025 8:35 am
BV just spews cum out of his cumtrap
21 Nov 2025 8:52 am
Just like I said mother ****.....The New York Times has a long record of publishing stories later proven false or misleading, from the Russian Revolution to the Iraq War and recent Gaza coverage. While it does sometimes, issue corrections, the damage is often already done, reinforcing perceptions of bias and unreliability.Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Don't be a dumb piece of ****.....I know you post AI crap.
This is about where you spend your time "informing" yourself.
List of The New York Times controversies - Wikipedia
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/nyt-lies-gaza-dies-protesters-vandalize-iconic-new-york-times-headquarters-over-controversial-article/articleshow/123022748.cms
https://www.nytco.com/press/tracking-misinformation-false-claims-about-times-reporting/
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
Who is online
In total there are 5569 users online :: 5 registered, 16 bots, and 5548 guests
Bots: Baiduspider, okhttp, MicroMessenger, ADmantX, proximic, Mediatoolkitbot, YandexBot, CensysInspect, DuckDuckBot, CriteoBot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, curl/7, bingbot