Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 8:31 am

Why are you challenging people with what they READ, Slack jaw?

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 10:21 am

It's not a challenge Bhenchod. It's a simple question. "Do you have a subscription?"...is a question. Roshambo answered immediately with a resounding ZERO.

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 10:56 am

The point of said question being?

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:00 am

I want to know how many more Slack Jawed bitches like you "subscribe" to the ****-hole paper. That's all.

chase me

fried
I live rent free in your mind

MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:00 am

I want to know how many more Slack Jawed bitches like you "subscribe" to the ****-hole paper. That's all.

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:03 am

Really?

Now list the sources on which you rely.

Unless, of course, you're in a rush to get that thing waxed again.

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:11 am

Sure....for starters, I get my news from the number one cable news network. They have been number one for TWENTY-THREE straight years.

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 7:47 am

You're a **** idiot.

https://collecttrumpcards.com/

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:13 am

Yet your shame is so great, you can't even type its name...

With good reason.

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:18 am

I know who it is. If you want to know, you can google it.

ROG62 » 21 Nov 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:15 am

funny thing, ****, you're STILL the only one who knows anything about them...

gd'damn man, I can't imagine the beatings you took as a kid...my condolences to your birth mother...

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:25 am

right.....because you're not like the idiots who buy that ****, and the watches, and the guitars, and the bibles....

Your stupid is sui generis..

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:22 am

This one, rube?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/meet-the- ... ud-claims/

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:28 am

The daily beast is nowhere close...

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:30 am

MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:28 am

The daily beast is nowhere close...

Stay ashamed....it's a good look on you.


 

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:30 am

Stay ashamed....it's a good look on you.

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

Huey » 21 Nov 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:32 am

Have you been told the Gutfeld spin by your masters?

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:38 am

Good point...   @Blackvegetable  so, what about that Gutfeld spin?

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 9:34 am

There's no "refutation", Clown.

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:40 am

To what "Gutfeld" spin are you referring?