Liberal Forum

It wasn’t until they got home that they saw the word “n*gs,” an abbreviated form of the “N-word,” printed on their receipt and the box their food was in.

When the couple placed their order, the manager on duty didn’t take down their names. After their leftover food was boxed up and placed in a bag, they went home. Later that morning, they wanted to reheat their potato wedges and saw the racial slur on the receipt.

They received a call the next day from the corporation vice president, who said the kitchen manager at the Woodbridge restaurant “had intentionally placed the racial slur on their order,” according to the complaint.

The company fired the employee.

The complaint asserts that the worker who typed the slur “knew, or should have known, that referring to the Lomans by a shortened version of a well-known racial slur was likely to result in emotional distress.”   

The term was “especially painful” for 37-year-old Marc Loman, who “has been subjected to racial animus and harassment in the past,” the suit states.   

The complaint goes on to say that the experience reopened “deep emotional wounds” that were tied to the “pervasive, brutalizing, and degrading racism that traumatized Mr. Loman while growing up in the Deep South.”

Loman reportedly “missed work and sought counseling” after the incident.   

He and his wife are seeking a $5 million judgment and $350,000 in punitive damages from Buffalo Wild Wings and the restaurant’s parent entity, Blazin’ Wings, Inc., for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

‘The Audacity’: Black Couple Sues Buffalo Wild Wings for $5 Million After Ordering Takeout, Then Finding Racial Slur on Their Receipt

 
 

MR-7 » 26 Nov 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2025, 9:49 am

It wasn’t until they got home that they saw the word “n*gs,” an abbreviated form of the “N-word,” printed on their receipt and the box their food was in.

When the couple placed their order, the manager on duty didn’t take down their names. After their leftover food was boxed up and placed in a bag, they went home. Later that morning, they wanted to reheat their potato wedges and saw the racial slur on the receipt.

They received a call the next day from the corporation vice president, who said the kitchen manager at the Woodbridge restaurant “had intentionally placed the racial slur on their order,” according to the complaint.

The company fired the employee.

The complaint asserts that the worker who typed the slur “knew, or should have known, that referring to the Lomans by a shortened version of a well-known racial slur was likely to result in emotional distress.”   

The term was “especially painful” for 37-year-old Marc Loman, who “has been subjected to racial animus and harassment in the past,” the suit states.   

The complaint goes on to say that the experience reopened “deep emotional wounds” that were tied to the “pervasive, brutalizing, and degrading racism that traumatized Mr. Loman while growing up in the Deep South.”

Loman reportedly “missed work and sought counseling” after the incident.   

He and his wife are seeking a $5 million judgment and $350,000 in punitive damages from Buffalo Wild Wings and the restaurant’s parent entity, Blazin’ Wings, Inc., for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

‘The Audacity’: Black Couple Sues Buffalo Wild Wings for $5 Million After Ordering Takeout, Then Finding Racial Slur on Their Receipt

Sounds like the employee got the order right.
 

RebelGator » 26 Nov 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2025, 10:16 am

Sounds like the employee got the order right.

Who knew the word "nigs" could be so painful and devastating  ...
 

MR-7 » 26 Nov 2025, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2025, 10:45 am

Who knew the word "nigs" could be so painful and devastating  ...

If we are going to live in a  society that criminalizes "emotionally painful slurs" then the term "Mother ****" should be equally illegal for the Jungle Savages to use against members of other races.
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 26 Nov 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2025, 11:01 am

If we are going to live in a  society that criminalizes "emotionally painful slurs" then the term "Mother ****" should be equally illegal for the Jungle Savages to use against members of other races.

Why is everything so hard on them. Math is hard, grammar is hard, Covid was hard, getting a JOB is hard...
 

MR-7 » 26 Nov 2025, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2025, 10:45 am

Who knew the word "nigs" could be so painful and devastating  ...

https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxQBS6aVgpku ... 84nlllnCrq
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 26 Nov 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2025, 11:01 am

If we are going to live in a  society that criminalizes "emotionally painful slurs" then the term "Mother ****" should be equally illegal for the Jungle Savages to use against members of other races.

So why hasn't Grafty sued AOC for calling him a rapist?

MR-7 » 26 Nov 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2025, 11:14 am

Why is everything so hard on them. Math is hard, grammar is hard, Covid was hard, getting a JOB is hard...

When I was stationed in Germany [1977 to 79] the Army was probably 60% White, 30% Black and the rest was....mostly Brown.
What made the races "equal" was the availability of cheap heroin.
It made the members of all races equally worthless once addiction set in.    
Every Pay Day the MPs would wave car loads of Turks through the gates, knowing full well that they were the drug dealers.
It almost looked like the Army deliberately allowed this...possibly as a way to weed out the weak minded...?