Liberal Forum

This is getting out of hand....their intentions are crystal clear



https://notwhatyousignedupfor.org/

What are they progressing too? Jihad

PhiloBeddo » 27 Nov 2025, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Nov 2025, 3:42 pm

What are they progressing too? Jihad

Pedo=progressivism and Islam are  pretty much one and the same anymore

both are national security threats 

It’s all how you interrupt what was said it’s a he said she said

Trump should force all Pedo=Progressive LGBTP Democrats to transition to the opposite sex....

their plan was to use the public school system to plant a mass psychosis about Trans Sexualism in the minds of America's children causing massive suffering...even suicide among our kids

All to solidify their power....that is PURE EVIL no matter how you look at it

Let them embrace their own scheme at the most personal and intimate of levels....the surgeon's scalpel

Project: "you've just made yourself too much of a risk to employ"

future employers turn to the internet and social media to pronounce judgement on hirable employee candidates

ruining your future self doing idiot things and violent anti-free speech protests is all the new rage on campus today

America's Universities...building America's Future Homeless and tomorrow's dependent class one failed student at a time


 

Lock them up

The Founding Fathers did not simply advocate for universal disobedience; rather, their arguments centered on a duty to resist tyranny and unjust laws that violated what they considered to be the fundamental rights of the people. They saw their actions not as anti-government, but as a defense against an oppressive regime 


 While often attributed to Thomas Jefferson, the idea that a man is obligated to disobey an unjust law was a key theme in the discourse surrounding the Revolution and the inherent rights of individuals against a tyrannical government

Trump to ban all 3rd world immigration in wake of national guard shooting

no more sub-human animals are allowed to come to America

Mrkelly » 28 Nov 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 11:46 am

Lock them up

The Founding Fathers did not simply advocate for universal disobedience; rather, their arguments centered on a duty to resist tyranny and unjust laws that violated what they considered to be the fundamental rights of the people. They saw their actions not as anti-government, but as a defense against an oppressive regime 

 While often attributed to Thomas Jefferson, the idea that a man is obligated to disobey an unjust law was a key theme in the discourse surrounding the Revolution and the inherent rights of individuals against a tyrannical government

I guess it's comes down to an opinion of what's an illegal order or an unjust law, since your opinion is ****, I'll go with mine.

Mrkelly » 28 Nov 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 11:46 am

Lock them up

The Founding Fathers did not simply advocate for universal disobedience; rather, their arguments centered on a duty to resist tyranny and unjust laws that violated what they considered to be the fundamental rights of the people. They saw their actions not as anti-government, but as a defense against an oppressive regime 

 While often attributed to Thomas Jefferson, the idea that a man is obligated to disobey an unjust law was a key theme in the discourse surrounding the Revolution and the inherent rights of individuals against a tyrannical government

So tell us, Kelly.  Which are the "unjust laws" that Trump has issued?
And if there are none that he's issued, which is a fact, then why did your beloved liberal Democrats have such an overwhelming need to provide such advice to our military at this time?
 

RebelGator » 28 Nov 2025, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 12:44 pm

I guess it's comes down to an opinion of what's an illegal order or an unjust law, since your opinion is ****, I'll go with mine.

Now you gone and done it...

Dribbles doesn't take criticism slathered with a heavy dose of reality very well

 

CIA linked afghan national shoots two national guard personnel

wonder what senator slotkin who is also cia has to say about it?

nefarious101 » 28 Nov 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 3:10 pm

CIA linked afghan national shoots two national guard personnel

wonder what senator slotkin who is also cia has to say about it?

she will say Trump set him off or republican policies effected his new life here he went insane 

BuckNaked » 28 Nov 2025, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 4:08 pm

she will say Trump set him off or republican policies effected his new life here he went insane

it's not that easy anymore and they know it

indicts have already come down on people thought not indictable 

the boil is about to be lanced

Zeets2 » 28 Nov 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 12:46 pm

So tell us, Kelly.  Which are the "unjust laws" that Trump has issued?
And if there are none that he's issued, which is a fact, then why did your beloved liberal Democrats have such an overwhelming need to provide such advice to our military at this time?

  nice talking point 

Where did they say he did?

they were reminding the troops that IF ANYONE gives them an illegal order, they don’t have to obey 

 

RebelGator » 28 Nov 2025, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 12:44 pm

I guess it's comes down to an opinion of what's an illegal order or an unjust law, since your opinion is ****, I'll go with mine.

  No goober

it comes down to what IS an illegal order according to the military code 

Mrkelly » 28 Nov 2025, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 7:10 pm

  No goober

it comes down to what IS an illegal order according to the military code

Like I said, your opinion is ****.

RebelGator » 28 Nov 2025, 7:13 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 7:13 pm

Like I said, your opinion is ****.

  sure that’s the same

opinion = code 

got it   

BuckNaked » 28 Nov 2025, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 4:08 pm

she will say Trump set him off or republican policies effected his new life here he went insane

The nerve of what these people say has no limits. I've seen plenty of liberal idiots arguing that the soldier shouldn't have been there.

Oh... so the solider shouldn't be able to work in their country... on their own streets.... but the **** radical Muslim should be allowed to freely waltz around. That's their mentality. It's **** sick.

Mrkelly » 28 Nov 2025, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 7:09 pm

  nice talking point 

Where did they say he did?

they were reminding the troops that IF ANYONE gives them an illegal order, they don’t have to obey

Why? Did they find an illegal order or are they simply trying to create doubt?

Have you noticed that **** is all the left has.