jerrab » 24 Nov 2025, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑ A military superior giving an illegal order to kill is a serious matter where the service member has a legal and moral obligation to refuse it, and a superior could be held responsible for the illegal order. Refusing a manifestly illegal order, such as one to commit a crime or a war crime, is not grounds for punishment and can be used as a defense in court. International law and the rules of armed conflict make it clear that a service member cannot be excused from criminal responsibility for following such an order.
*Roshambo » 30 Nov 2025, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Rumor has it.. the service members that "did as they were told" are seeking legal counsel .
Lawmakers voice support for congressional reviews of Trump's military strikes on boats
WAR CRIME
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawmakers from both parties said Sunday they support congressional reviews of U.S. military strikes against vessels suspected of smuggling drugs in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, citing a published report that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a verbal order for all crew members to be killed as part of a Sept. 2 attack.
The lawmakers said they did not know whether last week's Washington Post report was true, and some Republicans were skeptical, but they said attacking survivors of an initial missile strike poses serious legal concerns.
“This rises to the level of a war crime if it's true,”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/law ... 27956.html
Mark Kelly says committee will hold hearing on boat survivor strike
Aren't all military personnel torn down in basics and built back up to be killers?*Roshambo » 30 Nov 2025, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Rumor has it.. the service members that "did as they were told" are seeking legal counsel .
Lawmakers voice support for congressional reviews of Trump's military strikes on boats
WAR CRIME
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawmakers from both parties said Sunday they support congressional reviews of U.S. military strikes against vessels suspected of smuggling drugs in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, citing a published report that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a verbal order for all crew members to be killed as part of a Sept. 2 attack.
The lawmakers said they did not know whether last week's Washington Post report was true, and some Republicans were skeptical, but they said attacking survivors of an initial missile strike poses serious legal concerns.
“This rises to the level of a war crime if it's true,”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/law ... 27956.html
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom That's a military function, not by someone who's being investigated for seditious treason by...doubtful you guessed it, JAG...*Roshambo » 30 Nov 2025, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Mark Kelly says committee will hold hearing on boat survivor strike
The retired U.S. Navy captain said on "Meet the Press" that "we're going to put these people under oath."
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The Pete Whistel is Blowing Hard and Loud. Him and Gug Eye's will end up in jail.*Roshambo » 30 Nov 2025, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Rumor has it.. the service members that "did as they were told" are seeking legal counsel .
Lawmakers voice support for congressional reviews of Trump's military strikes on boats
WAR CRIME
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawmakers from both parties said Sunday they support congressional reviews of U.S. military strikes against vessels suspected of smuggling drugs in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, citing a published report that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a verbal order for all crew members to be killed as part of a Sept. 2 attack.
The lawmakers said they did not know whether last week's Washington Post report was true, and some Republicans were skeptical, but they said attacking survivors of an initial missile strike poses serious legal concerns.
“This rises to the level of a war crime if it's true,”
yahoo /news/articles/lawmakers-voice-support-congressional-reviews-184927956.html
It's standard military training for military personnel to understand they can refuse an order if they deem it illegal.ROG62 » 30 Nov 2025, 5:56 pm » wrote: ↑ That's a military function, not by someone who's being investigated for seditious treason by...doubtful you guessed it, JAG...
*Roshambo » 30 Nov 2025, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Mark Kelly says committee will hold hearing on boat survivor strike
The retired U.S. Navy captain said on "Meet the Press" that "we're going to put these people under oath."
*Roshambo » 30 Nov 2025, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Rumor has it.. the service members that "did as they were told" are seeking legal counsel .
Lawmakers voice support for congressional reviews of Trump's military strikes on boats
WAR CRIME
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawmakers from both parties said Sunday they support congressional reviews of U.S. military strikes against vessels suspected of smuggling drugs in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, citing a published report that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a verbal order for all crew members to be killed as part of a Sept. 2 attack.
The lawmakers said they did not know whether last week's Washington Post report was true, and some Republicans were skeptical, but they said attacking survivors of an initial missile strike poses serious legal concerns.
“This rises to the level of a war crime if it's true,”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/law ... 27956.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------*Roshambo » 30 Nov 2025, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Rumor has it.. the service members that "did as they were told" are seeking legal counsel .
Lawmakers voice support for congressional reviews of Trump's military strikes on boats
WAR CRIME
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawmakers from both parties said Sunday they support congressional reviews of U.S. military strikes against vessels suspected of smuggling drugs in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, citing a published report that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a verbal order for all crew members to be killed as part of a Sept. 2 attack.
The lawmakers said they did not know whether last week's Washington Post report was true, and some Republicans were skeptical, but they said attacking survivors of an initial missile strike poses serious legal concerns.
“This rises to the level of a war crime if it's true,”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/law ... 27956.html
Who is to "deem"?JohnnyYou » 30 Nov 2025, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ It's standard military training for military personnel to understand they can refuse an order if they deem it illegal.
Has Trump said once "I will never give an illegal order"?"He is signaling to everyone he obviously thinks he might have to. Why do you think SCOTUS gave him the Immunity they did? If Trump says to you "Take your windmill down to 5th Avenue and shoot anybody that looks like Don Quixote that comes near it" would you do it?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom *Roshambo » 30 Nov 2025, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Rumor has it.. the service members that "did as they were told" are seeking legal counsel .
Lawmakers voice support for congressional reviews of Trump's military strikes on boats
WAR CRIME
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawmakers from both parties said Sunday they support congressional reviews of U.S. military strikes against vessels suspected of smuggling drugs in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, citing a published report that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a verbal order for all crew members to be killed as part of a Sept. 2 attack.
The lawmakers said they did not know whether last week's Washington Post report was true, and some Republicans were skeptical, but they said attacking survivors of an initial missile strike poses serious legal concerns.
“This rises to the level of a war crime if it's true,”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/law ... 27956.html

That's Murder.jerrab » 30 Nov 2025, 9:15 pm » wrote: ↑ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hegseth ... =127951385
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth responded to a report that he ordered the military to kill all passengers aboard a boat suspected of ferrying drugs in the Caribbean Sea in September.According to The Washington Post, the Sept. 2 boat strike initially left two survivors clinging to the boat. The Post alleges Adm. Mitch Bradley, head of Special Operations Command, then ordered a second strike in order to comply with Hegseth's orders and to ensure the survivors couldn't call on other traffickers to retrieve them and their cargo.
Another act of hysterical denial from Nafellatio....nefarious101 » 01 Dec 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ another fake news post from ****.....rumor has it russia russia russia type fake news
russia russia russia hoax is a hoaxnefarious101 » 01 Dec 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ another fake news post from ****.....rumor has it russia russia russia type fake news
Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Another act of hysterical denial from Nafellatio....
If true, which it is not, that would make sense, we are males, she is a female.FJB » 01 Dec 2025, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑ roshambo and bv getting their dicks sucked by maineman's daughter
*Roshambo » 01 Dec 2025, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ russia russia russia hoax is a hoax
Well dickhead....Suicide if you're up to it....it would make the mental pain and anguish go away ...
