Liberal Forum

I doubt anyone without the training Hegseth has had would know anything about this. He's the expert and he's doing the job as promised. Of course, there will be some eyebrow raising...we have never had an effective LEADERSHIP like this before.

So where is this so-called evidence to support such claims. The Washington post saying it, does not make it so!! If the call was on a secured line, then who is the witness? Certainly not the reporter. The Washington post and other media outlets have been known to use anonymous sources that never pan out. If the Washington Post wants everyone to take them seriously, they better hand over the evidence. Otherwise - Fake liberal claims.  Sucks being a libby, I just know it does.

TRUMP said he believed he would win. TRUMP said he believed biden was incapable of winning. TRUMP said he believed harris would lose BIGLY. TRUMP said he believed the 2020 election was rigged. So, 

𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓'𝐒 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐓𝐎 𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐄𝐕𝐄  

Trump says he believes Hegseth '100%' on Venezuelan drug boat strike denial amid allegations

 
 

MR-7 » 01 Dec 2025, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:09 am

I doubt anyone without the training Hegseth has had would know anything about this. He's the expert and he's doing the job as promised. Of course, there will be some eyebrow raising...we have never had an effective LEADERSHIP like this before.

So where is this so-called evidence to support such claims. The Washington post saying it, does not make it so!! If the call was on a secured line, then who is the witness? Certainly not the reporter. The Washington post and other media outlets have been known to use anonymous sources that never pan out. If the Washington Post wants everyone to take them seriously, they better hand over the evidence. Otherwise - Fake liberal claims.  Sucks being a libby, I just know it does.

TRUMP said he believed he would win. TRUMP said he believed biden was incapable of winning. TRUMP said he believed harris would lose BIGLY. TRUMP said he believed the 2020 election was rigged. So, 

🚨 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓'𝐒 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐓𝐎 𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐄𝐕𝐄 🚨 

Trump says he believes Hegseth '100%' on Venezuelan drug boat strike denial amid allegations

The Washington post and other media outlets have been known to use anonymous sources that never pan out.

Really?

Examples?

https://x.com/randpaul/status/199519674 ... 9n13X5SQIA
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:15 am

Really?

Examples?

       

Gaza War Reporting (2024) The Washington Post cited “health officials” in Gaza claiming Israeli troops killed more than 30 people near a U.S. aid site. It turned out those officials were part of the Hamas‑controlled Gaza Health Ministry. The Post later issued a correction after criticism that it had acted as a mouthpiece for a terror organization.
 
 

MR-7 » 01 Dec 2025, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:23 am

       

Gaza War Reporting (2024) The Washington Post cited “health officials” in Gaza claiming Israeli troops killed more than 30 people near a U.S. aid site. It turned out those officials were part of the Hamas‑controlled Gaza Health Ministry. The Post later issued a correction after criticism that it had acted as a mouthpiece for a terror organization.

So they weren't "anonymous"...

Meanwhile, you cited FOX.


 

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2025, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:28 am

So they weren't "anonymous"...

Meanwhile, you cited FOX.

Wonder why the Post issued a "correction"?   
 

MR-7 » 01 Dec 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:32 am

Wonder why the Post issued a "correction"? 

Of course it's from FOX. Or do you think the Washington post would report this themselves? How **** stupid!   
 

MR-7 » 01 Dec 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:32 am

Wonder why the Post issued a "correction"? 

Have you asked yourself why FOX paid 787 million?

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:36 am

Have you asked yourself why FOX paid 787 million?

Have you asked why abc, cnn and cbs paid out millions to Trump?

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:15 am

Really?

Examples?

How did the example work out for you...  
 

FJB » 01 Dec 2025, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:42 am

Have you asked why abc, cnn and cbs paid out millions to Trump?

Because he's for sale..

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2025, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:44 am

Because he's for sale..

they lied, they paid
 

FJB » 01 Dec 2025, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:44 am

they lied, they paid

Post their lies...

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:46 am

Post their lies...

why did they pay?

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:36 am

Have you asked yourself why FOX paid 787 million?

 

ANd the reframing begins.  

FJB » 01 Dec 2025, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:47 am

why did they pay?

It's your issue.

Post their lies...

What's that smell?

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:36 am

Have you asked yourself why FOX paid 787 million?

We are discussing the "example" you wanted. You know, the one where wapo issued a correction. 
 

MR-7 » 01 Dec 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:55 am

We are discussing the "example" you wanted. You know, the one where wapo issued a correction.

You made some asshole comment and failed to back it up....then you followed with another asshole comment.

People who watch FOX lack the sense to refrain from comments about credibility, until it becomes about credibility.

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 11:15 am

Really?

Examples?

You.