Liberal Forum

Aw, how cute, the Salem ****** calling me out in tposts.  Which is funny because Coward Too Far is afraid to debate me.  He is like the kid in the Peanut Gallery hiding behind the fat kid while throwing **** at other.

@*TinyVictim yaps....


 
Here's your challenge


Post the first line of your sig.....




 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm

@*TinyVictim yaps....

Here's your challenge

Post the first line of your sig.....

arm's length, STFU...
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm

@*TinyVictim yaps....

Here's your challenge

Post the first line of your sig.....

The irony. Instead of debating him, the first thing he does is what he always does. Hides behind a demand, so he doesn't have to come up with any intelligent thoughts of his own. 

The level of cowardice is irreversible. 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm

@*TinyVictim yaps....

Here's your challenge

Post the first line of your sig.....

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

  

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm

@*TinyVictim yaps....

Here's your challenge

Post the first line of your sig.....

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

  
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm

@*TinyVictim yaps....

Here's your challenge

Post the first line of your sig.....

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

  

   

 
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm

@*TinyVictim yaps....

Here's your challenge

Post the first line of your sig.....

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

  

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

  

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

 
 

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

  
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm

@*TinyVictim yaps....

Here's your challenge

Post the first line of your sig.....

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

  

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

 
 

Principals of doubt working reasonable doubt throughout all remaining 5 generation gaps left within this species alive tomorrow, every second of every rotation of this planet forward 24/7 each revolution remaining perpetually balancing at this universal position so far.

Johnny You » 06 Dec 2025, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2025, 7:36 am

Every civilization reaches a fifth stage just before collapse.  It is described as where a society engages in Financialization and loses the capacity to properly interpret value with currency manipulation. Took out Egypt, The Mayans, The Romans, The Greeks, every single empire in history..   We are holding the pattern.

I see the peanut gallery is placed on this thread, so this won't stay long in NHB and I might be banned from posting again.

Which 5th stage of evolving ancestral lineages remains the last ones added each rotation of the planet forward now?

Cycles within the circle of living forward so far. inception of original 16 great great grandparents.

Conception of a 2nd generation gap of 8 great grandparents the beginning of ancestral lineages.

Conception of a 3rd generation being 4 grandparents born one at a time regardless race, creed, color, national origin in this atmosphere.

Conception of a 4th generation gap of 2 parenting the great great grandchildren of original 16 great great grandparents.

Conceived great great grandchildren repeating traditional believes life isn't self evident time adapting forward daily here by personal hearts beating for each brain navigating space one of a kind.

conception of a 6th generation gap life never duplicates previous ancestors again.

Currently somewhere between 350 and 400 generations saving humanity people of character cannot figure out why dictatorships and democracies never last more than 5 generations in the New World Order.

Doing the same things over and over expecting better days 7 days a week protecting 7 tomorrows every rotation forward expecting a different outcome next generation, is what?

a. Insanity,
b. Eternal Hell manifested cradle to grave,
c. absolute power of suggestion corrupted every ancestral lineage alive today.
d. nobody knew
e. every brain navigates personal time alive now.
f. Only takes changing one's mind to see what was wrong all the time.

moved in less than an hour.

This thread is another Pedo=progressive LGBTP democrat exercise in how to accomplish nothing

just like this was....who the hell comes up with this stupid ****...

look at the looks on their faces...

political theater for the powerless...stupid and they know it


 

nefarious101 » 06 Dec 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2025, 8:30 am

This thread is another Pedo=progressive LGBTP democrat exercise in how to accomplish nothing

just like this was....who the hell comes up with this stupid ****...

look at the looks on their faces...

political theater for the powerless...stupid and they know it

Looks like feeding time at the Zoo Ape Exhibit.

 

*31stArrival » 06 Dec 2025, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2025, 7:48 am

I see the peanut gallery is placed on this thread, so this won't stay long in NHB and I might be banned from posting again.

Which 5th stage of evolving ancestral lineages remains the last ones added each rotation of the planet forward now?

Cycles within the circle of living forward so far. inception of original 16 great great grandparents.

Conception of a 2nd generation gap of 8 great grandparents the beginning of ancestral lineages.

Conception of a 3rd generation being 4 grandparents born one at a time regardless race, creed, color, national origin in this atmosphere.

Conception of a 4th generation gap of 2 parenting the great great grandchildren of original 16 great great grandparents.

Conceived great great grandchildren repeating traditional believes life isn't self evident time adapting forward daily here by personal hearts beating for each brain navigating space one of a kind.

conception of a 6th generation gap life never duplicates previous ancestors again.

Currently somewhere between 350 and 400 generations saving humanity people of character cannot figure out why dictatorships and democracies never last more than 5 generations in the New World Order.

Doing the same things over and over expecting better days 7 days a week protecting 7 tomorrows every rotation forward expecting a different outcome next generation, is what?

a. Insanity,
b. Eternal Hell manifested cradle to grave,
c. absolute power of suggestion corrupted every ancestral lineage alive today.
d. nobody knew
e. every brain navigates personal time alive now.
f. Only takes changing one's mind to see what was wrong all the time.

moved in less than an hour.

Word Salad?   Priceless..  

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm

@*TinyVictim yaps....

Here's your challenge

Post the first line of your sig.....

         

Another  call out thread using Pg.  That is a real alpha male thing to…..​​​​​…oh never mind, you know it is a ****** move. Did you pin it also? 

I knew I could break you on this.  Although I broke you a long time time ago.
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm

@*TinyVictim yaps....

Here's your challenge

Post the first line of your sig.....

5 greenies for a tribute thread proving how much I own you.