Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Consistency Will Only Hobble The Gobblins Of Your Mind....Or Something...
Consistency Will Only Hobble The Gobblins Of Your Mind....Or Something...
By Blackvegetable
8 Dec 2025 7:36 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
12 posts • Page 1 of 1
8 Dec 2025 7:36 am
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/08/us/p ... bondi.html
Must the Military Disobey Unlawful Orders? Pam Bondi Has Said Yes.
“Military officers are required not to carry out unlawful orders,” she wrote. She elaborated: “The military would not carry out a patently unlawful order from the president to kill nonmilitary targets. Indeed, service members are required not to do so.”
The brief was filed in support of Mr. Trump, who was asking the Supreme Court to grant him immunity from prosecution on charges of trying to subvert the 2020 election. It was, more specifically, an effort to address a statement by one of Mr. Trump’s private lawyers, D. John Sauer, now the solicitor general, at an appeals court argument in January 2024.
Were you penning a script for a 3rd rate soap opera, a storyline like this would never get past first edit....
What are they gonna tell JohnBoy next?
Must the Military Disobey Unlawful Orders? Pam Bondi Has Said Yes.
“Military officers are required not to carry out unlawful orders,” she wrote. She elaborated: “The military would not carry out a patently unlawful order from the president to kill nonmilitary targets. Indeed, service members are required not to do so.”
The brief was filed in support of Mr. Trump, who was asking the Supreme Court to grant him immunity from prosecution on charges of trying to subvert the 2020 election. It was, more specifically, an effort to address a statement by one of Mr. Trump’s private lawyers, D. John Sauer, now the solicitor general, at an appeals court argument in January 2024.
Were you penning a script for a 3rd rate soap opera, a storyline like this would never get past first edit....
What are they gonna tell JohnBoy next?
what is the physical separation between each personal brain and social mind community on the world stage? Context.Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2025, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/08/us/p ... bondi.html
Must the Military Disobey Unlawful Orders? Pam Bondi Has Said Yes.
“Military officers are required not to carry out unlawful orders,” she wrote. She elaborated: “The military would not carry out a patently unlawful order from the president to kill nonmilitary targets. Indeed, service members are required not to do so.” The brief was filed in support of Mr. Trump, who was asking the Supreme Court to grant him immunity from prosecution on charges of trying to subvert the 2020 election. It was, more specifically, an effort to address a statement by one of Mr. Trump’s private lawyers, D. John Sauer, now the solicitor general, at an appeals court argument in January 2024.
Were you penning a script for a 3rd rate soap opera, a storyline like this would never get past first edit....
What are they gonna tell JohnBoy next?
What separates each brain alive daily here?
Chromosomes and generation gaps still alive.
Thankfully, someone made note of the obvious Fat Tail Risk...
Two other briefs in the immunity case, these opposing Mr. Trump, also addressed unlawful orders.
They agreed that members of the military must refuse to obey them. But they said presidents emboldened by the knowledge that they were immune from prosecution would put grave and dangerous pressure on those they commanded.
A brief from retired admirals and generals, along with former secretaries of the Army, Navy and Air Force, said that “the duty to disobey would be an unacceptably thin fail-safe against a president who was intent on flouting and who was permitted to flout the law without the possibility of criminal prosecution.”
A third brief, from national security and military experts, said that presidential immunity coupled with the power to pardon crimes would be a recipe for wholesale lawlessness.
“For example, in the SEAL Team 6 assassination scenario, the team members would not need to fear the consequences of committing murder,” the brief said, “if the order to commit the murder were coupled with the promise of a pardon.”
ibid..
Yet JohnBoy, FreeRide and their fellow halfwits enabled the election of a RAPIST FELON WITH ZERO IMPULSE CONTROL.
History will not stint on the Cruelty...
Two other briefs in the immunity case, these opposing Mr. Trump, also addressed unlawful orders.
They agreed that members of the military must refuse to obey them. But they said presidents emboldened by the knowledge that they were immune from prosecution would put grave and dangerous pressure on those they commanded.
A brief from retired admirals and generals, along with former secretaries of the Army, Navy and Air Force, said that “the duty to disobey would be an unacceptably thin fail-safe against a president who was intent on flouting and who was permitted to flout the law without the possibility of criminal prosecution.”
A third brief, from national security and military experts, said that presidential immunity coupled with the power to pardon crimes would be a recipe for wholesale lawlessness.
“For example, in the SEAL Team 6 assassination scenario, the team members would not need to fear the consequences of committing murder,” the brief said, “if the order to commit the murder were coupled with the promise of a pardon.”
ibid..
Yet JohnBoy, FreeRide and their fellow halfwits enabled the election of a RAPIST FELON WITH ZERO IMPULSE CONTROL.
History will not stint on the Cruelty...
Your question in the OP is pure syllogism creating a no win scenario for anyone trapped into debating the issue.Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ Thankfully, someone made note of the obvious Fat Tail Risk...
Two other briefs in the immunity case, these opposing Mr. Trump, also addressed unlawful orders.
They agreed that members of the military must refuse to obey them. But they said presidents emboldened by the knowledge that they were immune from prosecution would put grave and dangerous pressure on those they commanded.
A brief from retired admirals and generals, along with former secretaries of the Army, Navy and Air Force, said that “the duty to disobey would be an unacceptably thin fail-safe against a president who was intent on flouting and who was permitted to flout the law without the possibility of criminal prosecution.”
A third brief, from national security and military experts, said that presidential immunity coupled with the power to pardon crimes would be a recipe for wholesale lawlessness.
“For example, in the SEAL Team 6 assassination scenario, the team members would not need to fear the consequences of committing murder,” the brief said, “if the order to commit the murder were coupled with the promise of a pardon.”
ibid..
Yet JohnBoy, FreeRide and their fellow halfwits enabled the election of a RAPIST FELON WITH ZERO IMPULSE CONTROL.
History will not stint on the Cruelty...
Everyone knows by now that servicemembers are required not to carry out unlawful orders. It is now time to present evidence of a specific unlawful order and who issued it.Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2025, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/08/us/p ... bondi.html
Must the Military Disobey Unlawful Orders? Pam Bondi Has Said Yes.
“Military officers are required not to carry out unlawful orders,” she wrote. She elaborated: “The military would not carry out a patently unlawful order from the president to kill nonmilitary targets. Indeed, service members are required not to do so.” The brief was filed in support of Mr. Trump, who was asking the Supreme Court to grant him immunity from prosecution on charges of trying to subvert the 2020 election. It was, more specifically, an effort to address a statement by one of Mr. Trump’s private lawyers, D. John Sauer, now the solicitor general, at an appeals court argument in January 2024.
Were you penning a script for a 3rd rate soap opera, a storyline like this would never get past first edit....
What are they gonna tell JohnBoy next?
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2025, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/08/us/p ... bondi.html
Must the Military Disobey Unlawful Orders? Pam Bondi Has Said Yes.
“Military officers are required not to carry out unlawful orders,” she wrote. She elaborated: “The military would not carry out a patently unlawful order from the president to kill nonmilitary targets. Indeed, service members are required not to do so.”
The brief was filed in support of Mr. Trump, who was asking the Supreme Court to grant him immunity from prosecution on charges of trying to subvert the 2020 election. It was, more specifically, an effort to address a statement by one of Mr. Trump’s private lawyers, D. John Sauer, now the solicitor general, at an appeals court argument in January 2024.
Were you penning a script for a 3rd rate soap opera, a storyline like this would never get past first edit....
What are they gonna tell JohnBoy next?
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Predictions:
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
seems to be rarer than brown answering a question...if that's even possible....Huey » 08 Dec 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ Everyone knows by now that servicemembers are required not to carry out unlawful orders. It is now time to present evidence of a specific unlawful order who issued it.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
8 Dec 2025 10:49 am
Post the first line of @*TinyVictim's sig....ROG62 » 08 Dec 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ seems to be rarer than brown answering a question...if that's even possible....
STFU...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
9 Dec 2025 5:59 am
9 Dec 2025 6:00 am
we know dickheadBlackvegetable » 08 Dec 2025, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/08/us/p ... bondi.html
Must the Military Disobey Unlawful Orders? Pam Bondi Has Said Yes.
“Military officers are required not to carry out unlawful orders,” she wrote. She elaborated: “The military would not carry out a patently unlawful order from the president to kill nonmilitary targets. Indeed, service members are required not to do so.”
The brief was filed in support of Mr. Trump, who was asking the Supreme Court to grant him immunity from prosecution on charges of trying to subvert the 2020 election. It was, more specifically, an effort to address a statement by one of Mr. Trump’s private lawyers, D. John Sauer, now the solicitor general, at an appeals court argument in January 2024.
Were you penning a script for a 3rd rate soap opera, a storyline like this would never get past first edit....
What are they gonna tell JohnBoy next?
9 Dec 2025 6:24 am
12 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 4239 users online :: 3 registered, 12 bots, and 4224 guests
Bots: YandexBot, DuckDuckBot, okhttp, proximic, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, Googlebot, bingbot, Baiduspider, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google