Liberal Forum

We know he won't take the deal, because that would be a confession that he never answered. But it doesn't hurt to demoralize him again. 

What he will do:
1. Claim that he already gave th definition. One problem...the question isn't asking for a definition.
2. Give what isn't the answer. One problem. It's not asking what the answer is not. It is asking what the answer is. (That is a narcissist control thing he does. Tough ****. **** his control issues.).



Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

 
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

 

That's ok...I got this..


 

Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2025, 2:16 pm

That's ok...I got this..


 

QED.     

Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2025, 2:16 pm

That's ok...I got this..


 

 

Not only are you a true dickhead you are full of ****.  You ain't ignoring.  If you were you would not have entered the thread.  It only takes a second to turn it on and off.

Huey » 08 Dec 2025, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2025, 4:12 pm

Not only are you a true dickhead you are full of ****.  You ain't ignoring.  If you were you would not have entered the thread.  It only takes a second to turn it on and off.

Oh I know he isn't ignoring me. He usually sees when I post.     

Always worth the bump. 

Vegas » 08 Dec 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2025, 1:11 pm

We know he won't take the deal, because that would be a confession that he never answered. But it doesn't hurt to demoralize him again. 

What he will do:
1. Claim that he already gave th definition. One problem...the question isn't asking for a definition.
2. Give what isn't the answer. One problem. It's not asking what the answer is not. It is asking what the answer is. (That is a narcissist control thing he does. Tough ****. **** his control issues.).

Deal:

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

**** both of you **** stains.

murdock » 10 Dec 2025, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Dec 2025, 4:00 pm

**** both of you **** stains.