Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
If You.THOUGHT They Hated On Vanity Fair, Just Wait.....
If You.THOUGHT They Hated On Vanity Fair, Just Wait.....
By Blackvegetable
17 Dec 2025 6:03 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
17 Dec 2025 6:03 am
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... nity-fair/
Administration officials have lined up to defend White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, including leaders she insulted over the course of 11 on-the-record interviews with a writer for the magazine Vanity Fair.
Wiles and her allies said the two resulting articles, published Tuesday, took her out of context and cast the team in a negative light. Joining an outpouring of supportive statements from Cabinet secretaries and White House staffers, President Donald Trump praised Wiles and attacked Vanity Fair.
“I didn’t read it, but I don’t read Vanity Fair — but she’s done a fantastic job,” Trump told the New York Post on Tuesday. “I think from what I hear, the facts were wrong, and it was a very misguided interviewer, purposely misguided.”
Before getting into the Truthiness....
Why didn't Susan give this time to LibertyNews, Breitbart, or Maria Bartiromo, instead of Vanity Fair?
Why must Grafty rely on what other people tell him?
Is it because he is illiterate?
Administration officials have lined up to defend White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, including leaders she insulted over the course of 11 on-the-record interviews with a writer for the magazine Vanity Fair.
Wiles and her allies said the two resulting articles, published Tuesday, took her out of context and cast the team in a negative light. Joining an outpouring of supportive statements from Cabinet secretaries and White House staffers, President Donald Trump praised Wiles and attacked Vanity Fair.
“I didn’t read it, but I don’t read Vanity Fair — but she’s done a fantastic job,” Trump told the New York Post on Tuesday. “I think from what I hear, the facts were wrong, and it was a very misguided interviewer, purposely misguided.”
Before getting into the Truthiness....
Why didn't Susan give this time to LibertyNews, Breitbart, or Maria Bartiromo, instead of Vanity Fair?
Why must Grafty rely on what other people tell him?
Is it because he is illiterate?
17 Dec 2025 6:16 am
17 Dec 2025 6:19 am
17 Dec 2025 6:21 am
The Squealing Sisters of MAGA, Squealing Sister of MAGA.
17 Dec 2025 6:25 am
Is she a lesbian?Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... nity-fair/
Administration officials have lined up to defend White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, including leaders she insulted over the course of 11 on-the-record interviews with a writer for the magazine Vanity Fair.
Wiles and her allies said the two resulting articles, published Tuesday, took her out of context and cast the team in a negative light. Joining an outpouring of supportive statements from Cabinet secretaries and White House staffers, President Donald Trump praised Wiles and attacked Vanity Fair.
“I didn’t read it, but I don’t read Vanity Fair — but she’s done a fantastic job,” Trump told the New York Post on Tuesday. “I think from what I hear, the facts were wrong, and it was a very misguided interviewer, purposely misguided.”
Before getting into the Truthiness....
Why didn't Susan give this time to LibertyNews, Breitbart, or Maria Bartiromo, instead of Vanity Fair?
Why must Grafty rely on what other people tell him?
Is it because he is illiterate?
Only *** have time for Vanity Fairy.
17 Dec 2025 6:38 am
So Grafty is sending out the containment team to cover his *** with "***"?
Aren't you the one carrying the torch for an old man in henna?
17 Dec 2025 6:40 am
No, the *** want his ***.....take you, for example.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑ So Grafty is sending out the containment team to cover his *** with "***"?
Aren't you the one carrying the torch for an old man in henna?
17 Dec 2025 6:43 am
And now the deluge...
Check out VF's brilliant appeal to vanity bait.
Wiles and other top advisers, including Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, participated in a photo shoot and interviews for the story. The people close to Wiles said staff expected the photos to be taken by Annie Leibovitz, the famed photographer who has previously documented politicians for Vanity Fair, and they did not expect long articles to accompany the pictures.
ibid.
**** Imbecile Infotainers...
Check out VF's brilliant appeal to vanity bait.
Wiles and other top advisers, including Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, participated in a photo shoot and interviews for the story. The people close to Wiles said staff expected the photos to be taken by Annie Leibovitz, the famed photographer who has previously documented politicians for Vanity Fair, and they did not expect long articles to accompany the pictures.
ibid.
**** Imbecile Infotainers...
17 Dec 2025 6:45 am
You'd trust him near your ***, I'm sure..
And, hey, what's the worst that could happen?
You give up a little stink finger every day...
17 Dec 2025 8:06 am
hey dickhead....Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... nity-fair/
Administration officials have lined up to defend White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, including leaders she insulted over the course of 11 on-the-record interviews with a writer for the magazine Vanity Fair.
Wiles and her allies said the two resulting articles, published Tuesday, took her out of context and cast the team in a negative light. Joining an outpouring of supportive statements from Cabinet secretaries and White House staffers, President Donald Trump praised Wiles and attacked Vanity Fair.
“I didn’t read it, but I don’t read Vanity Fair — but she’s done a fantastic job,” Trump told the New York Post on Tuesday. “I think from what I hear, the facts were wrong, and it was a very misguided interviewer, purposely misguided.”
Before getting into the Truthiness....
Why didn't Susan give this time to LibertyNews, Breitbart, or Maria Bartiromo, instead of Vanity Fair?
Why must Grafty rely on what other people tell him?
Is it because he is illiterate?
Let me guess....you woke up triggered again this morning and it's all Trump's fault again
we've seen this movie before dickhead...
you played it over and over many times a day for over a decade
same old ****....same fake news....same pedo=prog tabloid links
you really need to get yourself a new trick
how's that narcissistic self-love thing you got going...you getting any off yourself
17 Dec 2025 8:09 am
@Deezer Shoovenefarious101 » 17 Dec 2025, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑ hey dickhead....
Let me guess....you woke up triggered again this morning and it's all Trump's fault again
we've seen this movie before dickhead...
you played it over and over many times a day for over a decade
same old ****....same fake news....same pedo=prog tabloid links
you really need to get yourself a new trick
how's that narcissistic self-love thing you got going...you getting any off yourself
Tell me again about how I post the same photo "repeatedly"....
17 Dec 2025 8:18 am
here Dickhead....Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ @Deezer Shoove
Tell me again about how I post the same photo "repeatedly"....
A little video about your best friends the islamo-nazis
you should get your LGTBP buddies and watch it....
I know...you could send the Islamo-nazis half naked pics of yourself like you do here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2Wnlwc-huo
17 Dec 2025 8:23 am
Wiles, who referred to herself as “a little bit of an expert in big personalities,” described Trump as having “an alcoholic’s personality,” saying he “operates [with] a view that there’s nothing he can’t do. Nothing, zero, nothing.”
Wiles offered candid assessments of the administration’s handling of files related to deceased financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Attorney General Pam Bondi, Wiles said, “completely whiffed” in handling the Epstein files.
“First she gave them binders full of nothingness,” Wiles said, referring to the binders handed to conservative influencers containing previously released information related to the Justice Department’s investigations of Epstein. “And then she said that the witness list, or the client list, was on her desk. There is no client list, and it sure as hell wasn’t on her desk.”
ibid.
Susie appears to suggest that Bondi is some kind d of hack...or whore, or something....
Wiles also appeared to contradict Trump’s unsubstantiated claim that former president Bill Clinton visited Epstein’s private island “supposedly 28 times.” She said “there is no evidence” those visits happened and, asked whether there was any incriminating information about Clinton in the files, Wiles said, “The president was wrong about that.”
She also claimed that neither she nor Trump was consulted about Maxwell’s transfer to a minimum-security prison camp in Texas, saying: “The president was mighty unhappy. I don’t know why they moved her. Neither does the president.”
Musk, Wiles claimed, was “an avowed ketamine [user]” who slept “in a sleeping bag in the EOB [Executive Office Building] in the daytime. And he’s an odd, odd duck, as I think geniuses are. You know, it’s not helpful, but he is his own person.”
When asked what she thought about Musk sharing a social media post about public-sector workers killing millions under Hitler, Stalin and Mao, she told the magazine, “I think that’s when he’s microdosing” but said she had no firsthand knowledge.
“Marco was not the sort of person that would violate his principles. He just won’t. And so he had to get there,” Wiles said, adding that Vance’s “conversion came when he was running for the Senate. And I think his conversion was a little bit more, sort of political.” OH, SNAP!
Wiles offered candid assessments of the administration’s handling of files related to deceased financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Attorney General Pam Bondi, Wiles said, “completely whiffed” in handling the Epstein files.
“First she gave them binders full of nothingness,” Wiles said, referring to the binders handed to conservative influencers containing previously released information related to the Justice Department’s investigations of Epstein. “And then she said that the witness list, or the client list, was on her desk. There is no client list, and it sure as hell wasn’t on her desk.”
ibid.
Susie appears to suggest that Bondi is some kind d of hack...or whore, or something....
Wiles also appeared to contradict Trump’s unsubstantiated claim that former president Bill Clinton visited Epstein’s private island “supposedly 28 times.” She said “there is no evidence” those visits happened and, asked whether there was any incriminating information about Clinton in the files, Wiles said, “The president was wrong about that.”
She also claimed that neither she nor Trump was consulted about Maxwell’s transfer to a minimum-security prison camp in Texas, saying: “The president was mighty unhappy. I don’t know why they moved her. Neither does the president.”
Musk, Wiles claimed, was “an avowed ketamine [user]” who slept “in a sleeping bag in the EOB [Executive Office Building] in the daytime. And he’s an odd, odd duck, as I think geniuses are. You know, it’s not helpful, but he is his own person.”
When asked what she thought about Musk sharing a social media post about public-sector workers killing millions under Hitler, Stalin and Mao, she told the magazine, “I think that’s when he’s microdosing” but said she had no firsthand knowledge.
“Marco was not the sort of person that would violate his principles. He just won’t. And so he had to get there,” Wiles said, adding that Vance’s “conversion came when he was running for the Senate. And I think his conversion was a little bit more, sort of political.” OH, SNAP!
17 Dec 2025 8:23 am
17 Dec 2025 8:26 am
Post yours...
17 Dec 2025 8:31 am
Oh, there's some good **** in here...
and budget director Russell Vought, whom she called a “right-wing absolute zealot.”
and budget director Russell Vought, whom she called a “right-wing absolute zealot.”
17 Dec 2025 8:32 am
Not how it works bitchboy... sad you play these games....
17 Dec 2025 8:37 am
But wait for the punch line....individually they may be twits and twats, but taken as a whole.....
The chief of staff said in a social media post that the articles “disregarded” what she called “significant context.”
["Your context is irrelevant.......(.....sob.....)!" - @*MankyLittleSkidmark]
“The article published early this morning is a disingenuously framed hit piece on me and the finest President, White House staff, and Cabinet in history,” Wiles wrote.
ibid.
The chief of staff said in a social media post that the articles “disregarded” what she called “significant context.”
["Your context is irrelevant.......(.....sob.....)!" - @*MankyLittleSkidmark]
“The article published early this morning is a disingenuously framed hit piece on me and the finest President, White House staff, and Cabinet in history,” Wiles wrote.
ibid.
17 Dec 2025 8:39 am
Then **** off.
17 Dec 2025 8:53 am
Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... nity-fair/
Administration officials have lined up to defend White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, including leaders she insulted over the course of 11 on-the-record interviews with a writer for the magazine Vanity Fair.
Wiles and her allies said the two resulting articles, published Tuesday, took her out of context and cast the team in a negative light. Joining an outpouring of supportive statements from Cabinet secretaries and White House staffers, President Donald Trump praised Wiles and attacked Vanity Fair.
“I didn’t read it, but I don’t read Vanity Fair — but she’s done a fantastic job,” Trump told the New York Post on Tuesday. “I think from what I hear, the facts were wrong, and it was a very misguided interviewer, purposely misguided.”
Before getting into the Truthiness....
Why didn't Susan give this time to LibertyNews, Breitbart, or Maria Bartiromo, instead of Vanity Fair?
Why must Grafty rely on what other people tell him?
Is it because he is illiterate?
@Johnny You @Mrkelly here is your chance to confront Veghead about his incessant evasions...yeah, I didn't think you would.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Predictions:
↓Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓newGH07 Copia 2
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Who is online
In total there are 2437 users online :: 9 registered, 15 bots, and 2413 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, jerra b, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, CensysInspect, YandexBot, CriteoBot, proximic, GPTBot, okhttp, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, Googlebot, Baiduspider, bingbot