Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 9:39 am

Then **** off.

you just prove you are a **** retard

Has anyone read this ****?


@Vegas  ?

viewtopic.php?p=2826999#p2826999

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 9:59 am

Has anyone read this ****?

@Vegas  ?

viewtopic.php?p=2826999#p2826999

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

↓
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓newGH07 Copia 2

How about this?


viewtopic.php?p=2827005#p2827005

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 11:17 am

How about this?

viewtopic.php?p=2827005#p2827005

Always stocking me.         

Is **** like this

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump. 

why no one reads @Vegas  ' ****?

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 11:21 am

Is **** like this

why no one reads @Vegas  ' ****?

Still stalking.         

I'm gonna proceed on the assumption that this


viewtopic.php?p=2827060#p2827060

is "Yes!"

@Vegas  
 

Vegas » 17 Dec 2025, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 9:53 am

@Johnny You  ​​​​@Mrkelly  here is your chance to confront Veghead about his incessant evasions...yeah, I didn't think you would.     

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors


 

The Great "See"

AI OverviewThe correct option is 
C. Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders. 
Explanation
Survivorship bias occurs when an individual concentrates on the "surviving" (successful) entities while overlooking those that failed, leading to a skewed perception of reality. Scenario C is a perfect example of this because the person is focusing only on the successful entrepreneurs featured in the media and ignoring the many who failed and were never profiled. This makes entrepreneurship seem easier and success more likely than it actually is. 
Why other options are incorrect

• A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them is a potential example of correlation/causation bias, but the core survivorship bias issue is less direct. While successful CEOs recommend books, many who read them may still fail. The bias here lies in assuming the books are the cause of success based only on the "survivor" CEOs' recommendations.
• B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies is an example of an incomplete analysis because it only looks at bankrupt companies, not all companies. However, this is closer to a selection bias where the conclusion is specifically about "most startups fail" after only analyzing "bankrupt companies," which are already a subset of failed companies. The classic survivorship bias focuses on successful cases leading to an overly optimistic view, rather than a pessimistic one.
• D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors is a standard market research practice. The survey sample includes actual customers, and it helps understand the reasons behind their choice. It is not an example of survivorship bias because it's a direct inquiry into the choices of an existing, defined group (your customers). 

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 7:03 am

no spam

Administration officials have lined up to defend White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, including leaders she insulted over the course of 11 on-the-record interviews with a writer for the magazine Vanity Fair. 

Wiles and her allies said the two resulting articles, published Tuesday, took her out of context and cast the team in a negative light. Joining an outpouring of supportive statements from Cabinet secretaries and White House staffers, President Donald Trump praised Wiles and attacked Vanity Fair.

“I didn’t read it, but I don’t read Vanity Fair — but she’s done a fantastic job,” Trump told the New York Post on Tuesday. “I think from what I hear, the facts were wrong, and it was a very misguided interviewer, purposely misguided.”

Before getting into the Truthiness....

Why didn't Susan give this time to LibertyNews, Breitbart, or Maria Bartiromo, instead of Vanity Fair?

Why must Grafty rely on what other people tell him?

Is it because he is illiterate?

Suzie got caught in the Coozer.. LMGDAO.

JD was a conspiracy theorist for 10 years.  Miuraculously, Trump's Smooth Brain MRI cured him. (It's a three body problem to figure which part got imaged)

My bowel movement was a smooth operator this morning too.  I bet Suzie can whoozie a baffroom.
 
 
 

JohnnyYou » 17 Dec 2025, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 11:26 am

The Great "See"

AI OverviewThe correct option is 
C. Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders. 
Explanation
Survivorship bias occurs when an individual concentrates on the "surviving" (successful) entities while overlooking those that failed, leading to a skewed perception of reality. Scenario C is a perfect example of this because the person is focusing only on the successful entrepreneurs featured in the media and ignoring the many who failed and were never profiled. This makes entrepreneurship seem easier and success more likely than it actually is. 
Why other options are incorrect

• A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them is a potential example of correlation/causation bias, but the core survivorship bias issue is less direct. While successful CEOs recommend books, many who read them may still fail. The bias here lies in assuming the books are the cause of success based only on the "survivor" CEOs' recommendations.
• B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies is an example of an incomplete analysis because it only looks at bankrupt companies, not all companies. However, this is closer to a selection bias where the conclusion is specifically about "most startups fail" after only analyzing "bankrupt companies," which are already a subset of failed companies. The classic survivorship bias focuses on successful cases leading to an overly optimistic view, rather than a pessimistic one.
• D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors is a standard market research practice. The survey sample includes actual customers, and it helps understand the reasons behind their choice. It is not an example of survivorship bias because it's a direct inquiry into the choices of an existing, defined group (your customers). 

BV needs his butt-buddy to answer for him.        Not going to happen. This is about principle. he needs to learn to stop evading while demanding others to answer his ****. I will continue until he alone answers and defends his answer in his own words. His hiding doesn't fly with me.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 11:24 am

I'm gonna proceed on the assumption that this

viewtopic.php?p=2827060#p2827060

is "Yes!"

@Vegas

Still stalking.     

Vitacost Brand Video

Vegas » 17 Dec 2025, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 11:29 am

BV needs his butt-buddy to answer for him.        Not going to happen. This is about principle. he needs to learn to stop evading while demanding others to answer his ****. I will continue until he alone answers and defends his answer in his own words. His hiding doesn't fly with me.

Well technically I didn't answer it either. Sole's Gal cheated for me.  She sleeps with everyone.

We should do a Multiple Choice on predictions for the future of humanity in the Age of  AIquerrys

I think you are like the only other one here who's dabbled with it.
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 9:09 am

@Deezer Shoove  

Tell me again about how I post the same photo "repeatedly"....

Again? I never told you once before.
Are you that stupid? Sorry about the rhetorical question.

DeezerShoove » 17 Dec 2025, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 12:08 pm

Again? I never told you once before.
Are you that stupid? Sorry about the rhetorical question.

So you don't read @Vegas  ' **** either....
 

So I caught some of @Vegas  ' ****...

This is about principle. he needs to learn to stop evading while demanding others to answer his ****. I will continue until he alone answers and defends his answer in his own words. His hiding doesn't fly with me.

I wonder if these are his words...


viewtopic.php?p=2166697#p2166697



@Vegas  ?

As a service to all of you who refuse to read @Vegas ' ****, including
@Vegas  , it goes like this....

 you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. 

 Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up. 

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 2:31 pm

So I caught some of @Vegas  ' ****...

I wonder if these are his words...

viewtopic.php?p=2166697#p2166697

@Vegas  ?

   

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2025, 2:27 pm

So you don't read @Vegas  ' **** either....

   Hi Mary.   
 

viewtopic.php?p=2827150#p2827150

viewtopic.php?p=2827151#p2827151


How will I know if I don't read his ****?

But, then I'd have to read his ****....

No one reads his ****.

I suspect there's a good reason.