>60,000/mo.MR-7 » 18 Dec 2025, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ Historic employment totals: The U.S. has more people employed now than at any previous time, reflecting population growth and labor force expansion. After years where inflation outpaced paychecks (especially 2021–2022), wages are now consistently beating inflation.That's another record under TRUMP
This is about "The U.S. has more people employed now than at any previous time, reflecting population growth and labor force expansion".̶B̶l̶a̶c̶k̶v̶e̶g̶e̶t̶a̶b̶l̶e̶
̶
̶>̶6̶0̶,̶0̶0̶0̶/̶m̶o̶.̶
̶
̶L̶E̶S̶S̶ ̶I̶S̶ ̶M̶O̶R̶E̶,̶ ̶C̶H̶I̶L̶D̶R̶E̶N̶!̶
That was true for 31 consecutive months of the Biden Presidency.MR-7 » 18 Dec 2025, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ This is about "The U.S. has more people employed now than at any previous time, reflecting population growth and labor force expansion".
When sources say “the U.S. has more people employed now than at any previous time”, the “now” refers to 2025, specifically data available through August 2025, when U.S. employment reached a record high of about 163 million peopleBlackvegetable » 18 Dec 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ That was true for 31 consecutive months of the Biden Presidency.
Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ That was true for 31 consecutive months of the Biden Presidency.
RebelGator » 18 Dec 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ What does it look like when you back out the illegal trespassers?
That's what I thought, taking things out of context are a Democrat hallmark.
Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ That was true for 31 consecutive months of the Biden Presidency.
Do you think he understands, or does he need a double tap?
Yea federal employees sucking off govt titBlackvegetable » 18 Dec 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ That was true for 31 consecutive months of the Biden Presidency.
Show me...
Wouldn't you require some evidence that they are on the payrolls being reported?RebelGator » 18 Dec 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ What does it look like when you back out the illegal trespassers?
That's what I thought, taking things out of context are a Democrat hallmark.
Don't double tap...he will post another shirtless selfie.RebelGator » 18 Dec 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ Do you think he understands, or does he need a double tap?
No...let's examine your Article of Faith..BuckNaked » 18 Dec 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ Face it plugs n jugs were a disaster it was a **** show
What is required here is evidence that the TITLE of the thread is not true. Do you have any evidence?Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ Wouldn't you require some evidence that they are on the payrolls being reported?
Only if it is noteworthy....MR-7 » 18 Dec 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ What is required here is evidence that the TITLE of the thread is not true. Do you have any evidence?
Phil,PhiloBeddo » 18 Dec 2025, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ Government jobs should not count. They cost us money. Only jobs that count are private industry.