Elon Musk set off a fresh firestorm this week by declaring that people will not need to save money in the future because artificial intelligence will eliminate poverty and usher in “universal high income."Responding on X to billionaire Ray Dalio’s praise of new “Trump Accounts” that seed $1,000 investment accounts for newborns, Musk called the initiative a “nice gesture” but said, “There will be no poverty in the future and so no need to save money. There will be universal high income.”Elon Musk says "universal high income" is coming
easy according to muskVegas » 19 Dec 2025, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ How does the wealthiest guy in the world not know econ 101? Universal income can eliminate poverty only if abundance grows faster than prices. That is an engineering, political, and structural problem, not just a monetary one.
Given the erratic behavior our beloved politicians and overall government structure, this is highly unlikely. We have to depend on the moral compasses of our leaders. Not going to happen.
How does he not know that?
Much of work will be optional. However, the elimination of poverty is unrealistic. Our system is designed to consolidate wealth. The 5% will just have more money to consolidate, that's all. They will be able to leverage AII to perfect monopolies, not disrupt them.Mrkelly » 19 Dec 2025, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ easy according to musk
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-mu ... me-2025-11In Elon Musk's future, we won't need jobs or money, and there will be no poverty.At the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum on Monday, where Musk sat on a panel with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, Musk said that money would "stop being relevant" thanks to AI."There will still be constraints on power like electricity and mass," Musk said. "But I think at some point currency becomes irrelevant."He linked it to the books of science fiction author Iain Banks, who wrote the Culture series between 1987 and 2012. Those books help "get a sense for what a probable positive AI future is like," he said.Musk also mentioned the end of work itself, saying that it will be "optional," like "playing sports or a video game."
- Elon Musk predicted a future where money will "stop being relevant," thanks to AI and robotics.
- Speaking at the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum, Musk also said that work would become "optional."
- Musk has previously said that AI robotics, like Tesla's Optimus, would eliminate poverty.
As SJConspirator used to say, many of th3 scarcities today are manufactured. We already see this with farm subsidies disincentivizing corporate agriculture from growing more food than what is needed to achieve a profit target.Vegas » 19 Dec 2025, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ How does the wealthiest guy in the world not know econ 101? Universal income can eliminate poverty only if abundance grows faster than prices. That is an engineering, political, and structural problem, not just a monetary one.
Given the erratic behavior our beloved politicians and overall government structure, this is highly unlikely. We have to depend on the moral compasses of our leaders. Not going to happen.
How does he not know that?
Vegas » 19 Dec 2025, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ How does the wealthiest guy in the world not know econ 101? Universal income can eliminate poverty only if abundance grows faster than prices. That is an engineering, political, and structural problem, not just a monetary one.
Given the erratic behavior our beloved politicians and overall government structure, this is highly unlikely. We have to depend on the moral compasses of our leaders. Not going to happen.
How does he not know that?
LowIQTrash » 19 Dec 2025, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ As SJConspirator used to say, many of th3 scarcities today are manufactured. We already see this with farm subsidies disincentivizing corporate agriculture from growing more food than what is needed to achieve a profit target.
Also, economists (from either side of the aisle) have tabulated the cost of UBI and it will cost many times more (per year) compared to whatever savings were generated from DOGE, whether those savings were true or not (hint: probably nowhere as magnificent as the conman says)