Liberal Forum

Many podcasters, such as the late Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens, and many others have gotten rich and famous off debating naive college students. It's easy to beat them in a debate. That makes them look smart. The fact is they would get their *** kicked good and hard if they went up against skilled and critical thinkers. 

This speaks volumes of where our society is when it comes to critical thinking. Debating college kids creates a mass following, but it doesn't create a mass following that can think critically.
 
 

Vegas » 21 Dec 2025, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 3:50 pm

Many podcasters, such as the late Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens, and many others have gotten rich and famous off debating naive college students. It's easy to beat them in a debate. That makes them look smart. The fact is they would get their *** kicked good and hard if they went up against skilled and critical thinkers. 

This speaks volumes of where our society is when it comes to critical thinking. Debating college kids creates a mass following, but it doesn't create a mass following that can think critically.

it's all about the talking points for the kiddies of today...critical thinking not needed...
 

ROG62 » 21 Dec 2025, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 4:00 pm

it's all about the talking points for the kiddies of today...critical thinking not needed...

Why would you two morons choose to go there?

Vegas » 21 Dec 2025, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 3:50 pm

Many podcasters, such as the late Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens, and many others have gotten rich and famous off debating naive college students. It's easy to beat them in a debate. That makes them look smart. The fact is they would get their *** kicked good and hard if they went up against skilled and critical thinkers. 

This speaks volumes of where our society is when it comes to critical thinking. Debating college kids creates a mass following, but it doesn't create a mass following that can think critically.

Charlie Kirk regularly destroyed professors at his events....check out his performance at Oxford snd then apologize for advancing the leftist cause. 
 
 

RebelGator » 21 Dec 2025, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 5:32 pm

Charlie Kirk regularly destroyed professors at his events....check out his performance at Oxford snd then apologize for advancing the leftist cause.

Link?


Charlie Kirk was a hack and a rhetorical coward.

Your type.

Blackvegetable » 21 Dec 2025, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 6:08 pm

Link?

Charlie Kirk was a hack and a rhetorical coward.

Your type.

Are you so stupid you can't type...Kirk, Oxford?

Dumb ****.

RebelGator » 21 Dec 2025, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 6:16 pm

Are you so stupid you can't type...Kirk, Oxford?

Dumb ****.

I saw him get his *** chewed up by a kid...

Blackvegetable » 21 Dec 2025, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 6:30 pm

I saw him get his *** chewed up by a kid...

Double dumb ****.

RebelGator » 21 Dec 2025, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 6:50 pm

Double dumb ****.

Strut your stuff, bitch

viewtopic.php?t=97946

Blackvegetable » 21 Dec 2025, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 7:21 pm

Strut your stuff, bitch

viewtopic.php?t=97946

Are you stalking Rebel now? Geeezeee dude. You need help.

Blackvegetable » 21 Dec 2025, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 5:24 pm

Why would you two morons choose to go there?

Everyone knows you would have given these oooking and eeeking baboons a standing ovation for their "outstanding  debating skills" and for their collegiate championship.....so be more careful about who you call a moron....  

https://youtu.be/fmO-ziHU_D8?si=GPApIdG70zFPmHlo
 
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Dec 2025, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 6:08 pm

Link?

Charlie Kirk was a hack and a rhetorical coward.

Your type.

The manly way to debate is with  hard facts and water tight reasoning.
OTOH...your endless string of vague questions is a stalling tactic that cowards and losers use...with the hope that their opponent will finally get bored and move on...  
 

Vegas » 21 Dec 2025, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 3:50 pm

Many podcasters, such as the late Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens, and many others have gotten rich and famous off debating naive college students. It's easy to beat them in a debate. That makes them look smart. The fact is they would get their *** kicked good and hard if they went up against skilled and critical thinkers. 

This speaks volumes of where our society is when it comes to critical thinking. Debating college kids creates a mass following, but it doesn't create a mass following that can think critically.

I paid almoost zero attention to politics until Obama got on the scene and had voted for 25 years.

Some of the young people I work with have incredible geo-political insight. I have ventured down into local and state politics myself which is a place I never thought would be of interest.

For better or worse, it is good to see young people getting WOKE. It could have been one reason Trump had Kirk murdered. Charlie may have been on a trajectory to run for POTUS.
 
 

JohnnyYou » 22 Dec 2025, 4:05 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2025, 4:05 am

For better or worse, it is good to see young people getting WOKE. It could have been one reason Trump had Kirk murdered. Charlie may have been on a trajectory to run for POTUS.

Charlie Kirk was a huge reason Trump defeated the Democrat cock-gobbler and Trump appreciated his efforts....why in the hell would you make such a preposterous statement like that?

Vegas » 21 Dec 2025, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 3:50 pm

Many podcasters, such as the late Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens, and many others have gotten rich and famous off debating naive college students. It's easy to beat them in a debate. That makes them look smart. The fact is they would get their *** kicked good and hard if they went up against skilled and critical thinkers. 

This speaks volumes of where our society is when it comes to critical thinking. Debating college kids creates a mass following, but it doesn't create a mass following that can think critically.

Good point.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Dec 2025, 12:23 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2025, 12:23 am

The manly way to debate is with  hard facts and water tight reasoning.
OTOH...your endless string of vague questions is a stalling tactic that cowards and losers use...with the hope that their opponent will finally get bored and move on...

You're an even bigger coward than @RebelGator  , and he's clinically a vagina...
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Dec 2025, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 6:08 pm

Link?

Charlie Kirk was a hack and a rhetorical coward.

Your type.

Example?

Blackvegetable » 22 Dec 2025, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2025, 6:49 am

You're an even bigger coward than @RebelGator  , and he's clinically a vagina...

The manly way to debate is with  hard facts and water tight reasoning.
OTOH...your endless string of vague questions is a stalling tactic that cowards and losers use...with the hope that their opponent will finally get bored and move on... 
 

DeezerShoove » 22 Dec 2025, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2025, 6:48 am

Good point.

It's easy to beat them in a debate.

I so much as turn in your direction, you void your bowels in terror.

Have you ever seen either of you twats win a debate?

Blackvegetable » 22 Dec 2025, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2025, 6:49 am

You're an even bigger coward than @RebelGator  , and he's clinically a vagina...

  Is this another call to be flagellated?

You'll be whipped at my discretion, not when you crave it.