AI would never identify a person in an image with 100% certainty. Hell, it wouldn't even try with any certainty. The only way for AI to say this is if it was directly told to. But on it's own, AI does not do that. It can't. It is incapable to analyze images of people with 100% certainty. Especially if they are in drag or some costume.The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.
DeezerShoove » 23 Dec 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ BowelVoid isn't too bright.
His tribute gloating thread SHOULD be about the numerous victories he's enjoyed.
Ever since he claimed we "void our bowels" at his very presence, I have had a case of the BlackVegetables.
Even my dog BlackVegetables when I log in to Liberal Forum. My toilet has been struggling with flushing the amount of BlackVegetable being visited upon my domicile.
Quite a BlackVegetabley day...
I hope BowelVoid removes the curse of scat he has laid at our feet.
Post my lie...Vegas » 23 Dec 2025, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ I caught him lying again. Now he wants you to ban me f@Blackvegetable![]()
![]()
This won't take nearly as long.Vegas » 22 Dec 2025, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑ You may ask yourself, why make a tribute thread about BV? Well...because it's fun to watch narcissists meltdown in public. That's why.
Anyway, I proved, through AI, that his beloved pic of who he thinks is Trump in drag cannot be verified. Therefore, he cannot prove that is Trump any more than we can prove it isn't. Yet, because he is a narcissist, he will claim it is Trump simply because he said so. I proved that VF's caption of attribution is an assertion. There is no evidence that VF verified it. Attribution and assertions does not equal evidence. VF can copyright and caption it to be BV's mom and it could be published as such.
As for his lie. He did an AI of his own. The last line proved he guided AI to say what he wanted it to say or he wrote the line himself:
AI would never identify a person in an image with 100% certainty. Hell, it wouldn't even try with any certainty. The only way for AI to say this is if it was directly told to. But on it's own, AI does not do that. It can't. It is incapable to analyze images of people with 100% certainty. Especially if they are in drag or some costume.
Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ This won't take nearly as long.
AI wasn't asked to identify the subject of the photo.
You're a **** idiot.
And I really want to know what **** college @Deezer Shoove attended..
LIE!The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.
This is how little you understand about AI.
And the blatant projection commences.Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ This is how little you understand about AI.
**** idiot.
Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ This won't take nearly as long.
AI wasn't asked to identify the subject of the photo.
You're a **** idiot.
And I really want to know what **** college @Deezer Shoove attended..
You insist you're smart because you say so
DeezerShoove » 23 Dec 2025, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑"I pretend to not be mocked so I can seem terrifying. Void your bowels."
Yep. This will be your go-to for now on. Like I said, my answer will always be the same: Already did. Go find it yourself, and then explain it.