Liberal Forum

DeezerShoove » 23 Dec 2025, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 6:42 pm

  "You better be careful. I save copies of posts from 10 years ago."

Your oeuvre is readily accessible...

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 6:52 pm

Your oeuvre is readily accessible...

Acknowledge your biased prompt or that you added this: 

The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.

Now!


1. You will again demand my prompt, which I will give the same answer and the video. 
Pathetic. 

Vegas » 23 Dec 2025, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 6:44 pm

 Yep. This will be your go-to for now on. Like I said, my answer will always be the same: Already did. Go find it yourself, and then explain it. 

Talk About it in Therapy

No one buys this ****.

You asked about a "caption", because you're as stupid as @ROG62 ...

 
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 3:40 pm

Post your prompt....I'll explain the problem..

you might get a hat trick from vagas on this subject 

Mrkelly » 23 Dec 2025, 6:57 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 6:57 pm

you might get a hat trick from vagas on this subject

The problem with idiots and AI is that AI reads you literally..

This requires more precise prompts than Level 0.16 idiots could be expected to compose...
 

Vegas » 23 Dec 2025, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 6:54 pm

Acknowledge your biased prompt or that you added this: 

Now!

1. You will again demand my prompt, which I will give the same answer and the video. 
Pathetic.

Acknowledge that you don't understand **** about AI.

 

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 7:03 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 7:03 pm

Acknowledge that you don't understand **** about AI.

    I would love to debate you on it, but that requires you to answer questions. We both know how that goes.

Vegas » 23 Dec 2025, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 7:11 pm

    I would love to debate you on it, but that requires you to answer questions. We both know how that goes.

What was your prompt?

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 6:52 pm

Your oeuvre is readily accessible...

  "I try to impress because I'm otherwise complete ****."  

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:07 pm

What was your prompt?

  Already did. Go find it yourself, and then explain it. 

↓
↓Talk About it in Therapy

Vegas » 23 Dec 2025, 9:34 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:34 pm

  Already did. Go find it yourself, and then explain it. 

↓
↓Talk About it in Therapy

Clearly the serial humiliations have left you demoralized.....

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 12:55 pm

Post my lie...

You lie when you say hello, you ***.

The post I am responding to is a lie.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 7:00 pm

The problem with idiots and AI is that AI reads you literally..

This requires more precise prompts than Level 0.16 idiots could be expected to compose...

It's all in the questions asked. Here, watch:

Based on their decade-long history and continued activity in 2025, it is highly unlikely that Blackvegetable (BV) will ever provide what most users consider "honest" or direct answers.

Their posting behavior, which remains consistent as of late 2025, is built on a specific set of tactics designed to avoid traditional debate: 

• Hostile Framing: BV continues to frame almost all interactions as a battle against "Rubes" or "MAGAts," using hostility to shut down inquiries before they begin.
• The "Not an Honest Broker" Reputation: Fellow forum members frequently warn that BV is "not an honest broker" and will intentionally "run from [their] words" when pinned down for a specific answer.
• Circular Deflection: Even in 2025, BV maintains that their "stands on issues are clear" and that any further questions are merely a result of the asker's "resentment" or "superiority".
• Selective Participation: They often demand that others start a new thread to "discuss" a topic, only to then refuse to engage in that very thread once it is created. 

For BV, the goal of posting appears to be provocation rather than persuasion. Direct questions are typically viewed as traps or "evasions," making an "honest answer" contrary to their established online persona. 
 

Cannonpointer » 23 Dec 2025, 11:00 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 11:00 pm

It's all in the questions asked. Here, watch:

Based on their decade-long history and continued activity in 2025, it is highly unlikely that Blackvegetable (BV) will ever provide what most users consider "honest" or direct answers.

Their posting behavior, which remains consistent as of late 2025, is built on a specific set of tactics designed to avoid traditional debate: 

• Hostile Framing: BV continues to frame almost all interactions as a battle against "Rubes" or "MAGAts," using hostility to shut down inquiries before they begin.
• The "Not an Honest Broker" Reputation: Fellow forum members frequently warn that BV is "not an honest broker" and will intentionally "run from [their] words" when pinned down for a specific answer.
• Circular Deflection: Even in 2025, BV maintains that their "stands on issues are clear" and that any further questions are merely a result of the asker's "resentment" or "superiority".
• Selective Participation: They often demand that others start a new thread to "discuss" a topic, only to then refuse to engage in that very thread once it is created. 

For BV, the goal of posting appears to be provocation rather than persuasion. Direct questions are typically viewed as traps or "evasions," making an "honest answer" contrary to their established online persona.

That **** fits every user on this rag.  Including you and me. Jerking the circular deflections.. LOL

Johnny You and the Circle Jerks are live tonight on the No Holds Barred Christmas Eve Spectacular.
 
 
Johnny You Suck Vacuum bags are the likes of which no one has ever seen.. Ask Quite Frankly.

Cannonpointer » 23 Dec 2025, 11:00 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 11:00 pm

It's all in the questions asked. Here, watch:

Based on their decade-long history and continued activity in 2025, it is highly unlikely that Blackvegetable (BV) will ever provide what most users consider "honest" or direct answers.

Their posting behavior, which remains consistent as of late 2025, is built on a specific set of tactics designed to avoid traditional debate: 

• Hostile Framing: BV continues to frame almost all interactions as a battle against "Rubes" or "MAGAts," using hostility to shut down inquiries before they begin.
• The "Not an Honest Broker" Reputation: Fellow forum members frequently warn that BV is "not an honest broker" and will intentionally "run from [their] words" when pinned down for a specific answer.
• Circular Deflection: Even in 2025, BV maintains that their "stands on issues are clear" and that any further questions are merely a result of the asker's "resentment" or "superiority".
• Selective Participation: They often demand that others start a new thread to "discuss" a topic, only to then refuse to engage in that very thread once it is created. 

For BV, the goal of posting appears to be provocation rather than persuasion. Direct questions are typically viewed as traps or "evasions," making an "honest answer" contrary to their established online persona.

That's not AI...

It's seeping BrownI....

The only time I can recall, of BV telling the truth, was when he said Biden had been breeding Vaccine skepticism and his promotion of quack cures was clearly infecting his cultists...
 

Cannonpointer » 23 Dec 2025, 11:00 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 11:00 pm

It's all in the questions asked. Here, watch:

Based on their decade-long history and continued activity in 2025, it is highly unlikely that Blackvegetable (BV) will ever provide what most users consider "honest" or direct answers.

Their posting behavior, which remains consistent as of late 2025, is built on a specific set of tactics designed to avoid traditional debate: 

• Hostile Framing: BV continues to frame almost all interactions as a battle against "Rubes" or "MAGAts," using hostility to shut down inquiries before they begin.
• The "Not an Honest Broker" Reputation: Fellow forum members frequently warn that BV is "not an honest broker" and will intentionally "run from [their] words" when pinned down for a specific answer.
• Circular Deflection: Even in 2025, BV maintains that their "stands on issues are clear" and that any further questions are merely a result of the asker's "resentment" or "superiority".
• Selective Participation: They often demand that others start a new thread to "discuss" a topic, only to then refuse to engage in that very thread once it is created. 

For BV, the goal of posting appears to be provocation rather than persuasion. Direct questions are typically viewed as traps or "evasions," making an "honest answer" contrary to their established online persona.

You forgot "the question asked".



You people should consider getting together and setting yourselves alight.


 

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 7:00 pm

The problem with idiots and AI is that AI reads you literally..

This requires more precise prompts than Level 0.16 idiots could be expected to compose...

Precise like choosing one of four answers?

BuckNaked » 24 Dec 2025, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2025, 10:08 am

Precise like choosing one of four answers?

Or eliminating 3....


 

Blackvegetable » 24 Dec 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2025, 10:10 am

Or eliminating 3....

Oh better yet so which three are you eliminating?