Not for you sensitive TDS MoFosMR-7 » 26 Dec 2025, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Rapid growth...Aggressive economic policy...A high‑energy market environment and a sense of “economic revival”.....
Trump economy compared to 'Reagan on steroids' | Watch
MY GOD! TRUMP hasn't even been in office for a year.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/maga-host ... etter%20AMMR-7 » 26 Dec 2025, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Rapid growth...Aggressive economic policy...A high‑energy market environment and a sense of “economic revival”.....
Trump economy compared to 'Reagan on steroids' | Watch
MY GOD! TRUMP hasn't even been in office for a year.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-lov ... -disaster/
You and Johnny are doing your share of the job loss stats.....that says a lot about the validity of the report.Blackvegetable » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-lov ... -disaster/
Rick Santelli, 69, was hyped up for the Friday morning release of the February jobs report—then quickly soured as he read the numbers, which were worse than expected in a fresh blow to 79-year-old President Donald Trump’s struggling economic agenda.
“Yes, here we go! This is the big Feb. job job jobs report!” Santelli said on CNBC’s Squawk Box. “Non-farm payrolls: minus 92,000! Minus 92,000. That is a biggie!”....
“If we look at labor force participation? Wow! A big drop!” he said. “We were expecting 62.5; 62.0 would be the weakest—and I have to really go back on this—62.0 would equal December of ’21 to find a smaller number.”
Johnny is working what? Two or three jobs now. Worthless ****.RebelGator » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You and Johnny are doing your share of the job loss stats.....that says a lot about the validity of the report.