Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑ MORANS!
Do you remember why you were told to hate on Jimmy Carter?
Hint:
Rhymes with
"Micromanaged everything down to the tennis court schedule.....deeeeeeerp!"
why are you idiots hesitating to kill yourselves?
Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ MORANS!
Do you remember why you were told to hate on Jimmy Carter?
Hint:
Rhymes with
"Micromanaged everything down to the tennis court schedule.....deeeeeeerp!"
why are you idiots hesitating to kill yourselves?
President Donald Trump’s eldest sons are investing in a new drone company, expanding their defense portfolio at a moment when the Pentagon is ramping up its own spending on unmanned aircraft systems.Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ But hanging over any deal for Warner Bros. is the question of how federal regulators, who must sign off, will respond. President Trump has said he plans to play a role in any decision.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/07/busi ... tflix.html
EVERYTHING they're told to get riled up about comes back around to kick these **** idiots in their buck teeth..
Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ But hanging over any deal for Warner Bros. is the question of how federal regulators, who must sign off, will respond. President Trump has said he plans to play a role in any decision.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/07/busi ... tflix.html
EVERYTHING they're told to get riled up about comes back around to kick these **** idiots in their buck teeth..
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ President Donald Trump’s eldest sons are investing in a new drone company, expanding their defense portfolio at a moment when the Pentagon is ramping up its own spending on unmanned aircraft systems.
Powerus, a West Palm Beach, Florida-based business, said Monday that it will go public in a deal backed by Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump. The company plans to combine with a Nasdaq-listed golf course operator, Aureus Greenway Holdings Inc., according to a statement.
Shares of Aureus Greenway jumped as much as 24% in New York on Monday, and were up 14% to $5.57 at 9:55 a.m.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... drone-deal
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
