Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
When Was The Last Time a Democrat President Passed An Across The Board Federal Tax Cut
When Was The Last Time a Democrat President Passed An Across The Board Federal Tax Cut
By Fuelman
7 Jan 2026 12:15 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
16 posts • Page 1 of 1
7 Jan 2026 12:15 pm
You have to go back awhile!
The last time Democrats led a major, across-the-board federal income tax rate cut was with the Revenue Act of 1964, passed under President Lyndon B. Johnson. This legislation, originally proposed by President John F. Kennedy, was a significant, across-the-board reduction: It lowered the top marginal income tax rate from 91% to 70%.It reduced the bottom individual income tax rate from 20% to 14%.It also cut the top corporate tax rate from 52% to 48%.
Amazingly, they still can't figure out why they don't get my vote 50 years later!
The last time Democrats led a major, across-the-board federal income tax rate cut was with the Revenue Act of 1964, passed under President Lyndon B. Johnson. This legislation, originally proposed by President John F. Kennedy, was a significant, across-the-board reduction: It lowered the top marginal income tax rate from 91% to 70%.It reduced the bottom individual income tax rate from 20% to 14%.It also cut the top corporate tax rate from 52% to 48%.
Amazingly, they still can't figure out why they don't get my vote 50 years later!
7 Jan 2026 12:17 pm
7 Jan 2026 11:50 pm
91%? SHEESH!Fuelman » 07 Jan 2026, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You have to go back awhile!
The last time Democrats led a major, across-the-board federal income tax rate cut was with the Revenue Act of 1964, passed under President Lyndon B. Johnson. This legislation, originally proposed by President John F. Kennedy, was a significant, across-the-board reduction: It lowered the top marginal income tax rate from 91% to 70%.It reduced the bottom individual income tax rate from 20% to 14%.It also cut the top corporate tax rate from 52% to 48%.
Amazingly, they still can't figure out why they don't get my vote 50 years later!
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." 
8 Jan 2026 12:01 am
Without fail, everytime a Democrat holds the WH, your wallet, your 401k, etc... takes a huge hit.
Johnny You: "Flying the pride flag is honorable".
8 Jan 2026 6:59 am
Wow!Fuelman » 07 Jan 2026, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You have to go back awhile!
The last time Democrats led a major, across-the-board federal income tax rate cut was with the Revenue Act of 1964, passed under President Lyndon B. Johnson. This legislation, originally proposed by President John F. Kennedy, was a significant, across-the-board reduction: It lowered the top marginal income tax rate from 91% to 70%.It reduced the bottom individual income tax rate from 20% to 14%.It also cut the top corporate tax rate from 52% to 48%.
Amazingly, they still can't figure out why they don't get my vote 50 years later!
This is Yahoo in a nutshell.
8 Jan 2026 7:16 am
I knew you wouldn't like this!Refute it if you can.
8 Jan 2026 7:20 am
Bidenomics helping the little guy:
Estimates of how much President Biden's regulations cost American households vary widely by source, with figures ranging from nearly $10,000 to $50,000 in lifetime costs per family, or over $15,000 annually, depending on the study's scope, methodology, and timeframe, often citing new environmental rules and spending-driven inflation as key drivers of increased household expenses. Reports from groups like the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and the Committee to Unleash Prosperity suggest significant costs, while the House Budget Committee and American Action Forum provide data often highlighting energy and appliance regulations as major contributors to higher prices.
Estimates of how much President Biden's regulations cost American households vary widely by source, with figures ranging from nearly $10,000 to $50,000 in lifetime costs per family, or over $15,000 annually, depending on the study's scope, methodology, and timeframe, often citing new environmental rules and spending-driven inflation as key drivers of increased household expenses. Reports from groups like the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and the Committee to Unleash Prosperity suggest significant costs, while the House Budget Committee and American Action Forum provide data often highlighting energy and appliance regulations as major contributors to higher prices.
8 Jan 2026 7:28 am
In the service of what argument?
You buy the same scam, repeatedly...then cast blame for the inevitable consequences.
8 Jan 2026 7:41 am
I can.Fuelman » 07 Jan 2026, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You have to go back awhile!
The last time Democrats led a major, across-the-board federal income tax rate cut was with the Revenue Act of 1964, passed under President Lyndon B. Johnson. This legislation, originally proposed by President John F. Kennedy, was a significant, across-the-board reduction: It lowered the top marginal income tax rate from 91% to 70%.It reduced the bottom individual income tax rate from 20% to 14%.It also cut the top corporate tax rate from 52% to 48%.
Amazingly, they still can't figure out why they don't get my vote 50 years later!
You're an idiot.
Even the stuff you think the government should do must be paid for.
And you reward those who pass that on, rather than paying the cost in real time.
Better yet, you consider it a virtue.
It might be defensible if these goniffs outperformed, but they have bequeathed disasters. Clearly evident in the data.....which you don't bother to actually look at.
8 Jan 2026 8:29 am
*** please, you can't point the finger, just find a mirror!Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ I can.
You're an idiot.
Even the stuff you think the government should do must be paid for.
And you reward those who pass that on, rather than paying the cost in real time.
Better yet, you consider it a virtue.
It might be defensible if these goniffs outperformed, but they have bequeathed disasters. Clearly evident in the data.....which you don't bother to actually look at.
As of early 2025, the Biden administration has approved approximately $4.7 trillion in net new ten-year debt through legislative and executive actions.
Revenue isn't the problem!
Enjoy your Trump tax cuts and an extra $6k write off for old ****.
8 Jan 2026 8:44 am
Fuelman » 08 Jan 2026, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑ *** please, you can't point the finger, just find a mirror!
As of early 2025, the Biden administration has approved approximately $4.7 trillion in net new ten-year debt through legislative and executive actions.
Revenue isn't the problem!
Enjoy your Trump tax cuts and an extra $6k write off for old ****.
The presidents for whom I've voted have REDUCED (or ELIMINATED) the deficit over their terms.
Every one,
Post your source....As of early 2025, the Biden
Then we can take a look to see how that compares to the competition....
They have that covered....They increase spending at a markedly higher rate as well.....Revenue isn't the problem!
Then they point to congress......
8 Jan 2026 9:10 am
The OP stands as truth and cannot be refuted.Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ The presidents for whom I've voted have REDUCED (or ELIMINATED) the deficit over their terms.
Every one,
Post your source....
Then we can take a look to see how that compares to the competition....
They have that covered....They increase spending at a markedly higher rate as well.....
Then they point to congress......
Democrats looking out for the little guy!
8 Jan 2026 9:17 am
You just made my point...Fuelman » 08 Jan 2026, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ The OP stands as truth and cannot be refuted.
Democrats looking out for the little guy!
8 Jan 2026 9:29 am
No, you made my point, you cannot refute the OP.
8 Jan 2026 9:51 am
You just showed that the OP was written by an idiot.
Who is now running from it.
8 Jan 2026 9:59 am
Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ You just showed that the OP was written by an idiot.
Who is now running from it.
you keep running away from defining the term woman
16 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 5908 users online :: 11 registered, 17 bots, and 5880 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, jerra b, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Huey
Bots: SuperBot, Bolt, TTD-Content, okhttp, DuckDuckBot, aiohttp, YandexBot, proximic, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, curl/7, Applebot, CriteoBot, Baiduspider