Liberal Forum

^^ runs away because he can't defend her lies. And we all KNOW she hits that "display this post" link, because she obviously CAN'T ignore me....

I'm not lying about anything. You're were one that "misquoted" Trump and still claims 20% = 42%. Yes, it's been calculated the same way since 1994, but we've never people who were unemployed so long they just gave up. That's the ONLY reason the unemployment rate has come down while the labor pa...

You yourself admitted it's calculated the same way since 1994. I assume you were telling the truth there and lying now. It's up to Trump and you his defender to prove it's one of the 3 or 4 or 5 random numbers he pulled out of his ***. Until then it is as you claim, calculated the same as it has bee...

Obsessive little creep....

You've ALREADY responded to me directly, you ignorant slut. Run away Misty, it's all you can do when you get called out for lying, and can't defend your position. As if I care. All you're proving here, is that you can't ignore me....

I know this little **** is trying to goad me into responding directly to him because I am seeing lots of these: Responding to the filthy little liar is as useful as repeatedly bashing ones head into a brick wall, and I have no desire to do either....

I'm not playing any semantic games. You lied. I called you on it. Trump WAS talking about the official unemployment rate, and said the government is lying. That's the WHOLE **** POINT. And he did not say it was "more like 42%". Another lie. He said it was "probably 20%". In liberaland, 20% is th...

Now he's trying to turn it around on you by playing his little semantics game. That's why I have the little **** on ignore. He will never admit that Trump was talking about the official unemployment rate issued by the BLS which counts people who want to work and are actively seeking employment. NOT...

You want to prove it's not "probably 20%" or do we just take your word for it?...

Neither of which is the accurate number for unemployment. He said "my guess is it's 20%" False He said he's seen figures aa high as 42% False. None of those are unemploment numbers. He lied. You keep defending it....