Liberal Forum

Smoke and mirrors. Fun with numbers. Catsup is a vegetable, the unemployed who run out of bennies are no longer "unemployed," and two guys trading debt is a "service."...

While you're in psychotic rant mode, here are more facts you completely ignored in your moonbat pseudo-analysis of Reagan's record. Real per-capita disposable income increased by 18% from 1982 to 1989, meaning the American standard of living increased by almost 20% in just seven years. The poverty ...

If some wackjob claimed that the moon is made of styrofoam, and you pointed out that few scientists believe it and noted that the overwhelming consensus is that it's made of rock, wouldn't it be stunningly stupid of that moonbat to bleat about "references to authority?" Wouldn't it be absurd if...

Citing important facts is "deference to authority?" Where's your figure on job creation under Reagan, psycho? Are you so stupid as to think that's not worth considering? Nearly 20 million new jobs were created during the recovery, increasing U.S. civilian employment by almost 20%. Unemployment...

More deference to authority. You are attacking me rather than my propositions, and deferring to the authority of alleged anonymous scholarship in the matter....

You see how gigantic your references to "authority" are, clemtard? IT'S FACTUALLY ESTABLISHED - doesn't say by whom, or demonstrate any rigor in the matter. Just parrots a claim from "facts" not in evidence. IT'S WRITTEN INTO THE HISTORY BOOKS. So would the "War of Northern Aggression" have been, ha...

More empty, evasive bleating from the board's worst psychotic....

Yes, because you put your ignorance, horrific judgment and psychosis over the best minds in the country on Economics and related matters. That's just stunningly stupid....

You could have asked, moonbat. And as usual, not one single word out of you about the great sources I cited and the important facts they brought. I posted your own words, Clemtard. That you could call that misrepresentation just shows your lack of self-examination. Your question did not at all ex...

I could not figure out how to make the names show, or I would have. I posted your own words, Clemtard. That you could call that misrepresentation just shows your lack of self-examination. If the question pulled a dirty trick by not properly representing your position, One of the thread's many visi...