User avatar
RichClem
18 Feb 2014 07:29 am
RichClem
User avatar
Largely because you mis-represented my claim in the question, so you're just being dishonest. And yes, as usual the board's imbeciles and liars side with a psychotic. Next time get a list of the names so we can have a laugh. On a board where people sling competing talking points ad nauseam, clemt...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Brattle Street
18 Feb 2014 07:29 am
Brattle Street
User avatar
more sheer propaganda troll crap...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
18 Feb 2014 07:26 am
RichClem
User avatar
Another liberal melts down into ignorance, evasions and bulls***. Congrats on fitting the stereotype....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
peepee
18 Feb 2014 07:25 am
peepee
User avatar
/\...(psssst..this stooooooopid f@ck, roach clip, doesn't even know what a dollar is and could be adequately replaced by a stinking parrot trained to squawk, 'republican good, democrat bad...squawk...republican good. democrat bad..)...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
18 Feb 2014 07:23 am
RichClem
User avatar
Yes, it is incorrect, and if you knew just the very basics about that period, you'd have rejected it off the top of your head....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
18 Feb 2014 07:22 am
RichClem
User avatar
"A monster." Yet given a choice between this demented psychotic and reality, it looks like every board liberal chooses the demented psychotic and rejects confirmed, factually established reality. Is there a single liberal who hasn't? Which is exactly why I use the term "moonbat."...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Brattle Street
18 Feb 2014 07:22 am
Brattle Street
User avatar
WSJ Propaganda Vehicle Foxified Rupert Murdoch has been busy sullying the Wall Street Journal news department's once impeccable reputation for objectivity. Murdoch made his buddy Robert Thomson the new WSJ editor and made Leslie Hinton the publisher who proceeded to "Fox-ify" the Journal as Joe Noc...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
18 Feb 2014 07:18 am
RichClem
User avatar
Twelve pages of appalling idiocy, psychosis, bulls*** and lies. And every liberal on the board buys it. This "debate" isn't debatable. It's factually established. It's written into the history books. Carter was a disaster on the economy and Reagan a huge success. And all the silliness wri...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
peepee
18 Feb 2014 07:02 am
peepee
User avatar
amazon tuna: The issue with the economy derived mainly from a monetary perspective. ...i believe i've exposed you as a monetary munchkin over at 'reagan remember...'...(i asked you to explain how "m1 money" originates...you could do it here if you like..) ...(yikes!...this roach clip/tuna s...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Silverfox
18 Feb 2014 04:34 am
Silverfox
User avatar
You don't need to change the entire methodology to change the result. I believe the concept of "discouraged" workers was introduced under Reagan. The inclusion of the military was under Reagan. The number of hours work required before someone is deemed "fully employed" was reduced. There were also c...
— LiberalForum Archive