User avatar
Nobody
23 Dec 2011 08:58 am
Nobody
User avatar
Deceitful partisan hack.Voter fraud is almost impossible to catch....But you always say it's rampant? How would you know that? .....it's typically deceitful of you to ignore the many, many, many examples I cite while bleating that Rove couldn't prosecute any.So where did you get those many, many, ma...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
23 Dec 2011 08:52 am
Nobody
User avatar
Gosh, Repubs won't go along with Obama's $40 annual tax cut that even the government says is impossible to implement? Don't spend it all in one place.That's $40 a week for the average working family Puss. I guess you're so loaded that doesn't mean much to you. To most people, it means a lot.Looks li...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Skeptic
22 Dec 2011 04:13 pm
Skeptic
User avatar
Sorry, you're just too freaking stupid to deserve a thoughtful response.What I wrote was 1) accepted by all the country's business/ Economics publications and 2) self apparent.Except to Marxist trolls.Can't answer the question, huh? I'm not surprised.What you regurgitated is right-wing mythology fo...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
22 Dec 2011 04:07 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Gee, Klem. If taxes were 0% to investors, and demand was still non-existent, would tax rates affect economic growth?Get a petri dish -- grow a brain cell.Even if your hypothesis were correct (which it isn't), Why would anyone invest if demand is flat?Sorry, you're just too freaking stupid to deserv...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Guest
22 Dec 2011 03:43 pm
Guest
User avatar
Which one of those people looks the most fit?Not Manchelle!...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Skeptic
22 Dec 2011 03:40 pm
Skeptic
User avatar
More troll bulls***, hiding behind empty rhetoric.Hey troll, you dodged the question. Here, try again.Gee, Klem. If taxes were 0% to investors, and demand was still non-existent, would tax rates affect economic growth?Get a petri dish -- grow a brain cell.Hey moonbat, almost all investing involves ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
22 Dec 2011 03:33 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Tax cuts can spur economic activity, sure (but not necessarily). But rises in actual productivity depend on technological change. More troll bulls***, hiding behind empty rhetoric.Hey troll, you dodged the question. Here, try again.If the income tax rate were 99%, it wouldn't effect economic grow...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Skeptic
22 Dec 2011 03:28 pm
Skeptic
User avatar
Such as:So if the income tax rate were 99%, it wouldn't effect economic growth?Come on, give an honest answer.Tax cuts can spur economic activity, sure (but not necessarily). But rises in actual productivity depend on technological change. Tax cuts given to investors do nothing if no demand exists...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
22 Dec 2011 03:17 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Still can't tell between opinion and lies, can you? Such as:Taxes do not affect 'economic growth,' "Konymist Klem."So if the income tax rate were 99%, it wouldn't effect economic growth?Come on, give an honest answer....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Skeptic
22 Dec 2011 03:13 pm
Skeptic
User avatar
Is this the best you can do, empty rhetoric?Can't get much more dishonest than that. What, are you trying to emulate Paul Begala?My rhetoric is better than yours and even YOU know it.Still can't tell between opinion and lies, can you?...
— LiberalForum Archive