User avatar
Henry_
27 Feb 2012 07:20 pm
Henry_
User avatar
Gosh, more empty rhetoric. You never seem to run out.So quote that part of the Constitution that mandates a "wall between church and state" or anything close to it. Freaking hilarious that you people keep declaring your opinions over and over, yet never actually quote the Constitution itself.Why is ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
27 Feb 2012 07:20 pm
Nobody
User avatar
RichClem, on 27 February 2012 - 07:36 PM, said:Do you psychotic moonbats see words there that I don't?Its no wonder you're a conservative. You're so focused on specific words. It is what the 1st Amendment means you moron. You can take your literalism and go have a circle jerk with the Christian an...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Oldschool
27 Feb 2012 07:16 pm
Oldschool
User avatar
Do you psychotic moonbats see words there that I don't?Its no wonder you're a conservative. You're so focused on specific words. It is what the 1st Amendment means you moron. You can take your literalism and go have a circle jerk with the Christian and Muslim Fundamentalists for all I care. We wo...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
27 Feb 2012 07:10 pm
Nobody
User avatar
So quote that part of the Constitution that mandates a "wall between church and state" or anything close to it. Do you psychotic moonbats see words there that I don't?Listen up Puss. Nobody ever said that those exact words - wall of separation between church and state - existed in the Constitution.B...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Herman 2 Feathers
27 Feb 2012 06:38 pm
Herman 2 Feathers
User avatar
Smiley faces. Moonbats. Phrases other men wrote. All done. Sincerely, rich clem....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
27 Feb 2012 06:36 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Ignoring the fact that I disagree with them moderately frequently. What, you think it's monolithic, even among conservatives?And the fact that I generally agree with them for logical, factual, politically philosophical reasons.And because I've read them for decades and found them to be very rel...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Misty
27 Feb 2012 04:47 pm
Misty
User avatar
Ignoring the fact that I disagree with them moderately frequently.That's sounds just like the amount of times we have sex My Clemmy. Moderately frequently....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Henry_
27 Feb 2012 04:46 pm
Henry_
User avatar
Ignoring the fact that I disagree with them moderately frequently. What, you think it's monolithic, even among conservatives?And the fact that I generally agree with them for logical, factual, politically philosophical reasons.And because I've read them for decades and found them to be very reliable...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
27 Feb 2012 04:43 pm
RichClem
User avatar
If the WSJ OP'ed does not say it's true, it's not...lolIgnoring the fact that I disagree with them moderately frequently. What, you think it's monolithic, even among conservatives?And the fact that I generally agree with them for logical, factual, politically philosophical reasons.And because I've r...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Henry_
27 Feb 2012 03:40 pm
Henry_
User avatar
This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by RichClem . View it anyway? Are you feeling frustated Puss?If the WSJ OP'ed does not say it's true, it's not...lol...
— LiberalForum Archive