Liberal Forum

I agree. Pearls before swine. I mean, who puts any value in citing over 200 years of Supreme Court decisions, anyway?Pretty funny given how outraged you were when you claimed I didn't cite enough sources about global warming.I'm the one citing Supreme Court precedent and sources to back my opinion ...

Unions, for example, spend much more on their own ads and electioneering efforts than is reported in public disclosure forms.And you know this how?Massive amounts in, snicker, "small donations" last election were simply bundled by the same Special Interest Groups that alwaysAlways what? Again you kn...

As I have said several times, I would like all campaign restrictions lifted so every American left, middle, right, libertarian, whatever can participate fully in the democratic process by giving whatever they choose to the candidate of their choice. That would overwhelm Special Interest money, a...

As I have said several times, I would like all campaign restrictions lifted so every American left, middle, right, libertarian, whatever can participate fully in the democratic process by giving whatever they choose to the candidate of their choice. That would overwhelm Special Interest money, almos...

I cited many sources including the Constitution itself, and over 200 years of Supreme Court precedent. What did you moonbats cite other than your ignorance? Go ahead, bleat away.you can cite away, it does not mean your argument is valuable to anyone other than you.I agree. Pearls before swine....

As I noted:Yeah, she has four styles of "debate."1) Stonewall.2) Evade3) Lie.4) Attack you personally.Although to be fair, I should have listed 5) deceive.I'm pretty sure deceive and lie are the same thing Puss.I'm disappointed. When I saw you had posted something, I was so sure that you were going ...

I cited many sources including the Constitution itself, and over 200 years of Supreme Court precedent.What did you moonbats cite other than your ignorance?Go ahead, bleat away.As I noted:Although to be fair, I should have listed 5) deceive.Emoticon enthusiast, you can cite away, it does not mean you...

Skeptic, on 23 February 2012 - 05:26 PM, said: They belong in clem-bat's "Skeptic - constitutional expert" thread.A fine addition, I would think.I cited many sources including the Constitution itself, and over 200 years of Supreme Court precedent.What did you moonbats cite other than your ignorance?...

25% of super PAC money coming from just 5 rich donors.Five wealthy people have donated nearly $1 of every $4 flowing to the super PACs raising unlimited money in this year's presidential race, a USA TODAY analysis shows.Dallas industrialist Harold SimmonsVegas casino mogul Sheldon AdelsonSheldon Ade...

They belong in clem-bat's "Skeptic - constitutional expert" thread.A fine addition, I would think....