User avatar
Brattle Street
17 Feb 2014 09:18 pm
Brattle Street
User avatar
you are DONE clemmy. no one is buying. you are an amateur propagandist. Awake and aware, observant and perceptive people see right through your mask. You are more suited to addressing the people with an IQ below 40....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
17 Feb 2014 08:42 pm
Nobody
User avatar
It wasn't a joke Jackhole. The guy who was running for governor of New York, sent bestiality videos to the people on his e-mail list. And you said he was qualified to be governor. And of course there is the great John Fund, who bedded the daughter of his former lover. You call him a man of high int...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
AmazonTania
17 Feb 2014 08:35 pm
AmazonTania
User avatar
What change are you referring to? The only change to the BLS methodology since 1940 was in 1994. Prior to 1994, the BLS use to ask people if they searched for work recently. If people give the BLS one of five reasons why they haven't searched for work within the last 4 weeks, they were assumed to ha...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
17 Feb 2014 08:21 pm
Nobody
User avatar
You think the WSJ OpEd page is objective?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
17 Feb 2014 08:20 pm
Nobody
User avatar
I know, right? That was some funny ****....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
AmazonTania
17 Feb 2014 08:00 pm
AmazonTania
User avatar
Um, sure... It got better because it got better? Yeah. It got better because it got better. There weren't any underlying factors that cause the improvement of the economy. The economy wasn't experiencing and frictional or structural unemployment. The issue with the economy derived mainly from a ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
17 Feb 2014 06:50 pm
golfboy
User avatar
I didn't ask you to restate your prior post, I asked why you used nominal gdp instead of real, and what policies lead you to claim Reagan was responsible for the 30 year trend on your chart....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Spirit of Molly
17 Feb 2014 06:46 pm
Spirit of Molly
User avatar
Obviously, Reagan was not president in 1980, when GDP growth peaked. His policies did not take effect until around '82, where it looks like the growth rate drops sharply, rebounds a bit, then goes into decline. Reagan claimed he would make things better. "Morning in America" looks more like a swift ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
17 Feb 2014 06:43 pm
golfboy
User avatar
You lose. I was wondering how long it was going to take you to admit your failure....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
17 Feb 2014 06:22 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Can you link is to him making Reagan responsible for 80-82? Also, if he had shown a graph that ran from 1968 to 1990, and used it to illuminate Reagan's record, would you have pretended that he was putting 1968 on Reagan? One more thing - how long have you been a boy toucher?...
— LiberalForum Archive