User avatar
tharock220
22 Jul 2014 11:53 pm
tharock220
User avatar
All I'm asking is for your calculations man. You're a semi-intelligent person so I figured you could show me the arithmetic. Wrong. The Singapore government does not manage Temasek. It simply owns it. I will concede that it is socialized, nationalized, or whatever, but the company manages its own...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 Jul 2014 11:52 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Carter inherited that stagflation from Nixon taking us off Bretton Woods - so there ya go. Reagan fixed Nixon's mess. Whatever, son. The FEDERAL RESERVE is the real culprit and both parties play ball. I notice that regulation of corporations - which deal with chemicals and radio-active materials, ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 Jul 2014 11:45 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
1. What number do you propose? I have done the work and presented it on this board. I have no time this second to either hunt for that or reproduce it - but what it your counter-proposition? I'm not a quibbler. Throw a number at the wall, for argument's sake. 2. Link? Our own government manages co...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
tharock220
22 Jul 2014 11:39 pm
tharock220
User avatar
1. I understand you're talking about Temasek, but how did you come up with that number??? 2. You realize the government of Singapore doesn't manage its day to day operations, unlike our own government's involvement in companies, right??? It's much like Statoil in that government gets its piece after...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 Jul 2014 11:30 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Gosh - ya think? You mean like when you bathroom funny boys call it socialism when obie puts a nickel into GM, and Capitalism when Singapore owns 30% of the means of production? At the end of the say, son - after you jokes have been made to squirm for your persistent misuse of the word socialism ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Str8tEdge
22 Jul 2014 07:18 pm
Str8tEdge
User avatar
Of course. Nothing would make her happier than to see them forced into a disadvantage in the labor market based on their religious beliefs. It's what religious bigots do....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cedar
22 Jul 2014 07:15 pm
Cedar
User avatar
Would you have preferred they end all coverage for their employees until the mandate kicked in? I have my doubts the mandate will ever kick in....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cedar
22 Jul 2014 07:12 pm
Cedar
User avatar
The ACA....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
greatnpowerfuloz
22 Jul 2014 06:59 pm
greatnpowerfuloz
User avatar
So if Hobby Lobby simply refused to provide any coverage at all, they could have avoided the Supreme Court until the mandate became enforced? i view Hobby Lobby's appeal to the Supreme Court on the basis of a religious objection as being an acknowledgement of the employer mandate, on a whole, which...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Str8tEdge
22 Jul 2014 06:57 pm
Str8tEdge
User avatar
Come on..... In progressive lala land, not buying something for a progressive IS violating their rights. See the thread on Detroit water bills for example....
— LiberalForum Archive