User avatar
Cannonpointer
08 Dec 2012 01:30 am
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Does that mean when the government comes to shut down a business because it didn't abide by the ADA, the owner is free and clear to shoot to kill in defense of his ktichen because the government was **** in it? No. He can do what he wants, and then deal with the consequences. What it means is tha...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Capitalist Swine
08 Dec 2012 12:39 am
Capitalist Swine
User avatar
You bet your ***. The first sniveler of your kind was Cain, who implied that we are not our brother's keeper - that lying murderer. You bet your *** you have a right to use force against other people - a right and a duty, in fact. Just try [excrement]ting in my kitchen and see what happens. Does t...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
08 Dec 2012 12:16 am
Cannonpointer
User avatar
One of those human rights granted by the creator is to exertcontrol against another person? You bet your ***. The first sniveler of your kind was Cain, who implied that we are not our brother's keeper - that lying murderer. You bet your *** you have a right to use force against other people - a ri...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
07 Dec 2012 01:44 pm
Nobody
User avatar
I'd like to know what Goofboy does understand.Very little....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Skeptic
07 Dec 2012 01:41 pm
Skeptic
User avatar
I guess Golfboy doesn't understand the difference between this type of procedural maneuver and filibustering your own bill, which is what McConnell did. I'd like to know what Goofboy does understand. So far ......
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
07 Dec 2012 12:42 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Harry is the Majority Leader. There is a special rule that if the majority leader votes "yes" and the bill is defeated, its GONE, but if he votes "No" and its defeated, it can be brought back again at a later time. Harry Reid has only voted no on bills (even if they were his own) which already FAILE...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
The Voice of Reason
07 Dec 2012 12:36 pm
The Voice of Reason
User avatar
you should be sure of your facts before calling anyone a liar. http://www.washingto...-own-debt-bill/ This one was "an accident": http://voices.washin...y-votes-no.html Link 1: Harry didn't vote against his own bill. FAIL Link 2: Harry voted Yes (after correction). FAIL Please do me a favor. S...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
07 Dec 2012 12:33 pm
golfboy
User avatar
That is a lie. Harry is the Majority Leader. There is a special rule that if the majority leader votes "yes" and the bill is defeated, its GONE, but if he votes "No" and its defeated, it can be brought back again at a later time. Harry Reid has only voted no on bills (even if they were his own) whi...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
The Voice of Reason
07 Dec 2012 12:07 pm
The Voice of Reason
User avatar
Harry Reid has voted against his own bills repeatedly, under exactly the same circumstance. It's amazing that liberals,especiallya Senator in leadership like Durbin either doesn't know that, or lies. Of course Democrats lap this crap up without knowing or caring about the truth. That is a lie. Ha...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
07 Dec 2012 11:59 am
golfboy
User avatar
Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) scoffed at that notion that a senator would ask for a vote on a bill in good faith while requiring that it be “filibuster-proof.” “This may be a moment in Senate history, when a senator made a proposal that, when given an opportunity for a vote on that propos...
— LiberalForum Archive