User avatar
RichClem
22 Jul 2014 04:59 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Which is an obvious falsehood. No one was preventing women from buying birth control. No women's rights were being violated. The issue was over whether individuals running small corporations could be coerced into buying something for employees, that grossly violated their religious beliefs. Thanks...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
22 Jul 2014 04:59 pm
golfboy
User avatar
So, as always, when you make a moronic claim like this, you can't back it up when challenged. If you had any pride, you'd slink away from here in shame....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
greatnpowerfuloz
22 Jul 2014 04:38 pm
greatnpowerfuloz
User avatar
Except that the issue over the constitutionaliity of mandatory employer coverage was never in contention during the Hobby Lobby ruling. Her dissenting opinion had to do with the religious rights of employers superseding the rights of women. As mandatory employer coverage was not at issue, she had no...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
22 Jul 2014 04:24 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Except that Ginsberg supported mandatory employer coverage, so she's less thoughtful than you claim....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
greatnpowerfuloz
22 Jul 2014 04:15 pm
greatnpowerfuloz
User avatar
I would have approved of the Hobby Lobby decision if they'd taken the fight a step further by going for a ruling against mandatory employer coverage. I'm way ahead of you, child....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
greatnpowerfuloz
22 Jul 2014 04:09 pm
greatnpowerfuloz
User avatar
You should ask your admirers to put their money where their compliments are and toss a few more greenies your way, then. You're lagging behind the rest of us....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
22 Jul 2014 04:06 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Cite her, snicker, "reasoning" on Hobby Lobby decision. This ought to be good for a laugh. You know, those who pose a threat to your piddily paycheck. WTF?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
greatnpowerfuloz
22 Jul 2014 04:03 pm
greatnpowerfuloz
User avatar
By those who embrace reason over rhetoric and talking points. You know, those who pose a threat to your piddily paycheck....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
22 Jul 2014 03:58 pm
RichClem
User avatar
I'm always pleased when the liberal-left shows not only its idiocy, but it's deeply ugly character. I've received more compliments for my thoughts and sources than I can remember, from thoughtful, intelligent, informed members. How many have you received and from whom?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
22 Jul 2014 03:56 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Are you going provide actual evidence for your silly claim that they're "hard right?" No? I never thought you would. By the way, Justice Ginsberg's opinion has been heralded as the voice of reason, which will prevail when the voice of favoritism finally goes silent. It was a rant that bare...
— LiberalForum Archive