User avatar
Huey
02 Jan 2014 05:26 pm
Huey
User avatar
I didn't say they attempted to reform it did I? I said they had the outlines of a plan and they caved to the dems before it got off the ground. If that is not good enough I hope you brought a good book while you are waiting over there....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
02 Jan 2014 05:24 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
You have the outlines of a defense. Don't stop now. Your clients are about to walk, under the terms I laid out. In what year and through what piece of proposed legislation did the repub majority attempt to reform health care (please don't pretend the trillions in new entitlements = reform), and wh...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
02 Jan 2014 05:17 pm
Huey
User avatar
Actually they did. They never had anything close to a super majority in the senate and without 60 votes you know what happens. That is why it is so **** hilarious watching both McConnell and Reid switch their positions on the filibuster....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
02 Jan 2014 05:13 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
I have the outlines of a carrot shaped vagina in my trousers. For six years, they NEEDED NO DEMS. Fir six years, they had NO ONE TO CAVE TO. "They chose to wait for false opposition before addressing an existenctial threat." - That statement right there would not pass a jury's sniff test. If it ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
02 Jan 2014 05:09 pm
Huey
User avatar
Actually, they had the outlines of a plan prior to Obama. Tax incentives and more market based. I have posted it before. But they caved to the dems....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
02 Jan 2014 05:07 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Good observation - they left plausible deniability in their puppet show - unlike the ******* dems, who voted for the patriot act and for war funding and lost their nominee over it. But the real proof of their culpability is their institution of a new entitlement as their ONLY foray into fixing a b...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
02 Jan 2014 05:06 pm
Huey
User avatar
One post is civil, the next post she is well, you decide.... I do talk about them. But I wasn't here. Why are you afraid to quote Simeon's entire post misty? Easier to pretend you didn't see it? Misty » 02 Jan 2014 4:42 pm wrote: I'm not for people having to choose not to see a doctor when th...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
02 Jan 2014 05:03 pm
Nobody
User avatar
That was my point exactly. You never talk about those people, because you obviously don't care about them....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
02 Jan 2014 04:59 pm
Huey
User avatar
I will be able to answer that later after I see what the republicans do about it. And that won't be until after the next election. It was an easy thing not to for vote if they were in on it because their votes were not needed....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
02 Jan 2014 04:56 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
By whom? You are easily able to devine, I will wager, that tthe dems were "in on" the patriot act. Adter all, we have their votes. But THIS scam was foisted on us without a single republican vote. Their participation - their culpability - is harder to make a case for (though I am happy to do so, he...
— LiberalForum Archive