Liberal Forum

Misty » 09 Nov 2016 1:22 pm » wrote:The mountain of **** in Trump's acceptance speech.
He ran a campaign based on division by race, religion and ethnicity.

Oh, horse ****, misty. The man had norwegian, irish, lithuanian, polish, russian, belgian, french, english, scottish, bulgarian, swiss, swedish, latvian, ukranian, danish, hungarian, german, estonian, finnish, georgian - just about every **** ethnic group in the country. Who WASN'T in his coalition? NAME them.

If you're talking about the blacks, they ALWAYS vote democrat. ALWAYS.

ALWAYS.

"**** them where they eat" is the ONLY reasonable position for a republican candidate to take. Your silly implication that tRump should have run his **** campaign to pander to a small, implacable demographic which is over-represented on every form of public assistance including imprisonment, on the PREPOSTEROUS theory that he can out-pander the democrats, is just asinine. It is truly stupid. His campaign was CLEARLY geared to the law abiding - not to the professional victim, perpetually wounded underclass.

WHO WAS NOT IN tRUMP'S COALITION? NAME THEM.

Mexicans? Excuse me - he called illegal immigrants a human CRIME WAVE. You can't walk that back and he'd have been a fool to try.

Who did I leave out? *** and dykes and Lola? Ignorant pants suiters who vote based on plumbing?

Your skank lost, their **** *** won - show some grace under pressure (assuming that your candidate getting corn holed and thrown in a dumpster by the american public again is "pressure").