I find it quite ironic that in their objection to recounts taking place Trumps lawyers wrote:
"All available evidence suggests that the 2016 general election was not tainted by fraud or mistake.
By "contesting" the clear choice of millions of voters in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Stein aims to sow doubts regarding the legitimacy of the presidential election.....
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/O ... 4089_7.pdf
It was their guy who told us for months that the election was going to be rigged and who just a few days said this:
Oh, wait.....I forgot.....we're not to take him literally, right?
He wasn't really trying to sow any doubts regarding the legitimacy of the presidential election when he said those things.
Silly me for thinking that.