Termin8tor » 12 Dec 2016 8:41 am » wrote:
Hey Dim, that I place far more blame on Clinton and the Democrat Party does not absolve Bush for the far smaller blame he deserves.
The
FAR SMALLER blame.
Always with the little qualifiers.
Some things never change.
**** weasel.
Termin8tor » 12 Dec 2016 8:41 am » wrote:And only a hopeless Dim would claim that a few speeches by any president is more important than decades of law, regulation and political intimidation that Dems are responsible for.
It wasn't just a few speeches you jackass. It was his policies.
And he could have changed the decades of laws anytime he wanted to.
He had a rubber stamp Congress for quite a while.
He did change the regulations.
He relaxed them.
Political intimidation?