17 Dec 2016 3:08 pm
Hmmm....let's compare the Clinton Foundation's ratings to those of the Trump Foundation's ratings, shall we?Termin8tor » 17 Dec 2016 2:42 pm » wrote:True, the Clinton's are far, far, far more corrupt, but also more indirect.
They enriched themselves by $250 million, not counting the Clinton Foundation Slush Fund $2 billion or so, much of it from foreign governments and Special Interests.
It's perfectly obvious to anyone with eyes how corrupt they are, but you Democrat Talking Point Liars deny it all.
That's why she deleted 33,000 emails and Bleach-washed her server, then lied they were about yoga and her daughter's wedding.
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index. ... rgid=16680
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index. ... rgid=16764
The Clintons gave 1 million dollars to their foundation in tax year 2015.
Trump hasn't put a dime into his foundation since 2008.
And he has used the money that other people gave to make political contributions, buy goodies for himself and pay off some of his legal settlements.
Let me know when you want to discuss something besides the Clintons.
They are irrelevant at this point.
I'm much more concerned with the future.
You seem to want to dwell on the past.
I'm sure it's just a deflection from having to deal with the fact that you voted for a fraud/con-artist, serial groper/sexual assaulter and racist/Birther.