Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 4:07 pm » wrote:You called him exactly that.
When I get my computer running, I'll quote you.

Don't bother.
I'll post what I said for you.

In 2008 someone on the old forum mentioned John Fund, and I remembered hearing something about a scandal involving him and the daughter of his girlfriend, but I didn't know any of the details, so I asked the question:



And for 8 over years this maniac has been accusing me of 'calling' John Fund a 'child molester.'

RichClem » 07 Feb 2012 2:04 pm » wrote:Yeah, sure, like you just innocently "asking" if John Fund was a child molester.

Note that I did not use the word 'child' in my question.
Once I researched the story I found out that Fund had a relationship with the adult daughter of his long time girlfriend, and I said as much on the forum.

But if you do a search of the word 'molester' in this thread, you will see pages and pages of Clem still accusing me of 'calling' John Fund a 'child molester.'
Unfortunately my thread at the old forum is gone, because it was filled with the same accusations.

RichClem » 13 Jan 2014 1:00 pm » wrote:You smeared him by alleging he "molested" his girlfriend's daughter.

RichClem » 11 Dec 2013 3:06 pm » wrote:You started by smearing Fund as a child molester and have done little except stonewall and lie since then.

RichClem » 10 Dec 2013 8:39 am » wrote:You tried to smear him as a child molester. You're a truly disgusting person for trying that.

RichClem » 02 Apr 2013 10:38 am » wrote:You smeared him as a child molester without even knowing the facts?

RichClem » 29 Mar 2013 10:21 am » wrote:What kind of sick person smears a decent man as a child "molester?"

It looks like Clem is now going to pick up right where he left off.

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 1:34 pm » wrote:Why did you smear John Fund rather than consider his extensive evidence?

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 1:44 pm » wrote:Why did you smear John Fund with ugly lies when I cited his extensive evidence?

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 3:26 pm » wrote:Why did you smear John Fund as a child molester when I cited his extensive evidence?

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 3:35 pm » wrote:Why did you smear him as a "child molester?"

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 3:56 pm » wrote:Why did you call the highly respected John Fund a "child molester?"

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 4:10 pm » wrote:Obviously, the highly respected John Fund isn't a child molester, as you accused him of being.

That is one sick puppy.

My only mistake was asking a question about something I wasn't sure about.
And he has been clubbing me over the head with it since 2008.

Misty » 30 Mar 2013 11:05 am » wrote:I had remembered hearing something about a scandal involving John Fund and the daughter of his ex-girlfriend, but I didn't know what it was all about, which is why I asked the question.



Since when is asking a question a smear?

Clem calls John Fund a man of high integrity.



That man of 'high integrity' had a secret sexual relationship with the mentally unstable daughter of his ex-girlfriend/long time friend.
(And forced her to have an abortion.)
She saw him as a father figure and went to visit him for guidance, and instead of offering her guidance he started a sexual relationship with her.

Of course Clem said that she (the 23 year old vixen) seduced poor innocent 50 year old John Fund.
So I guess it's okay to smear the woman.