I don't hate reagan, dimwit - I hate trickledown.
You act as if you're ambushing me with the knowledge that his successors stayed the trickle down course -
including obama. I point that out because most of you people are so stupid, you thought he was different than bush.
Given the number of times
I have told YOU that my enemy is tricke down,which is a direct assault on the middle class, I have to assume you're slow on the uptake - and I think it would be unfair of ANYONE to blame me for it.
Huey » 21 Jan 2017 10:10 am » wrote:
This is why I asked you to be specific. All Reagan did was support the abolition of the Fairness Doctrine. So no, I do not believe that is needed today.
What you meant to ask is should we return to the rules that Clinton removed.[/quote[ The rules
reaganomics, aka voodoo economics, aka trickle down, removed. I give a **** which president signed it - if it had been reagan, that would have meant a democrat congress sent it to is desk. Thanks for defending them and putting the blame where it belongs: on one neocon president working hand in glove against America with a republican house and senate.
You waitin on me, chubby hubby, you're walkin backwards.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?