29 Jan 2017 8:24 am
Well, trying to wiggle out of your hot spot with who puts the troops in harm's way is a failure, cannon. That has nothing whatsoever to do with the situation. That's no different than the girl walking down the street at night alone.Cannonpointer » 28 Jan 2017 11:34 pm » wrote:You ever put me in a hot spot, child, I retire from posting.
First, who puts our troops in harm's way are those who use them as an invading army against the spirit of our Constitution. Two types of folks on our battle fields: Those fighting because they were born there, and those fightng because they were sent there - by a government run by and for bankers. Doesn't take much sense to sort the good guys from the bad.
Yeah, because **** if they can't take a joke. I care about the kids of other parents who could be saved from horrible death and how they got in the situation or who put them there doesn't matter to me - it does to you - so **** those parents who want their kids to come home to them.Our troops are not there for YOUR INTERESTS, you silly girl. If Wall Street did not want them there they would not be there. The last things our misused and put-upon troops need are orders to torture prisoners, infant.
It's only imaginary if it isn't you having to decide anything.Second, what I might do in your totally imaginary Jack-Off-Bauer situation has nothing to do with what I would willingly empower your precious federal nanny state to do. I can **** my girlfriend, but that doesn't mean I have to let tRump exercise the feudal privilege of prima nocta (Not that I'm saying he would - she isn't a 10).
Third, we already have provisions under existing law for your Jack Bauer masturbation - google "exigent circumstances." We do not need laws codifying into existence the infrastructures for torture, complete with doctors, lawyers, receptionists, cleaners, maintenance workers, torturers, pay scales, officially recognized torture implements, designated tortures areas, instruction manuals detailing accepted tortures, etc., etc.
You assume that if I would torture some guy to prevent my daughter's grisly death, then I must empower your precious federal government to torture others - without even a trial. And you ASSUME these monsters will retire quietly, never having gotten a taste for their grisly profession. What you call for is the opening of Pandora's Box, ya retard - you have not thought your position through.
What I see, not assume, is that you would save YOUR daughter, but not Carl Menard's daughter who will be beheaded at sunrise at the hands of ISIS, because she, in your despicable mind, shouldn't be there in the first place. **** Carl and **** his daughter.
Here's another thought, you despicable ****: CARE ABOUT PEOPLE BESIDES YOURSELF.Little tip for ya, Sparky: Those who excel in the art of torture probably are not going to be people you want for neighbors. As to those who do not, we'll have to deal with the mental issues that putting them to such devil-work produces, ya simple minded hick.
Here's a thought, you stupid ****: LIMITED GOVERNMENT.