User avatar
Huey
30 Jan 2017 12:10 pm
User avatar
      
33,883 posts
Cannonpointer » 30 Jan 2017 12:06 pm » wrote:We don't get to cherry pick in support of cowardly policies.
It's abundantly clear that you do support torture, from the fact that you jumped in on the side of those arguing for it, AND from the sleazy manner in which you pretend that torture is something undefined in law and unidentifiable in fact. "The things YOU call torture."
A place where tortures are routinely committed is not a torture chamber because I say so, fraud. It's a torture chamber because it's where the torture takes place.

Sneaking dishonest imputations into your apologia demonstrates your greasiness on the issue, torture boy.
Nor have I torture boy.

The only reason you stickle on those "three wet terrorists" is that you dishonestly framed the debate around them in the first place.

The debate about torture has NOTHING TO DO with those three, asshole.

It has to do with what kind of government we want. You want one that can waterboard, and I want one that cannot.
You are being dishonest again. I did not jump in on the side of those supporting torture. That was you extrapolating a comment about the three terrorists that were waterboarded.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search