Huey » 30 Jan 2017 12:18 pm » wrote:
I don't deny it. You are missing the point. You are taking a comment that was referencing three (the other hundreds have not been proven) and applying it as blanket support for torture in general. Nothing could be further from the truth.
The senate investigation was rolled out, by me, to you, on this board.
The fact that you cannot remember things you wish to pretend don't exist -
inconvenient thruths - is your problem, not mine.
Correct. Our laws do, our treaties do, the U.N. does, but dick suckers don't. Already knew that.
A dick sucker can say, "I'm not for torture, but I'm for cutting off their dick because I make my own definitions." But that's a dick sucker.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?