31 Jan 2017 10:56 pm
And I am not even close to giving a **** and cannot imagine why YOU do, except that someone instructed you to. And don't even try to deny it - the entire conjob sisterhood has its panties on fire over this non **** issue, all loaded up with arguments against the term muslim ban.Huey » 31 Jan 2017 1:29 pm » wrote: The difference is I presented facts to support the "talking point" as well as showing he walked that promise, that I condemned, back. This isn't even close to a muslim ban.
Furthermore, why the **** would you have condemned a full-on ban, ala, "No More Room At The Inn?" Why would you CONDEMN our nation saying sand *** need not apply?
They are from the sand, are they not? They are ***, are they not?
Then they're sand ***, ***.
Y'know what we need up in here?
Muslim ban, ***.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?