Liberal Forum

Huey » 07 Feb 2017 5:06 pm » wrote:! As usual their is more to the story. Seems the bill is a little broader than misty wanted to let us know. From her link and intentionally left out of her cut and paste:

Yeah, I INTENTIONALLY left it out.
That's why I gave you the link to the full article.
I figured most of you were smart enough to click on a link.
Anyway that part of the article does not change my opinion in the least.

So you think that people who are designated as too mentally ill to manage their own financial affairs should own a gun?
Will you still feel that way when one of these people moves in next door to you?