Liberal Forum

#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 1:48 pm » wrote: How can you declare that there was nothing going on if there is an ongoing investigation?
Flynn was undercutting Obama who was still the POTUS when he put the sanctions into effect.
One president at a time.

Why would Flynn tell Russia not to sweat the sanctions that were put into place because they meddled in our election?
That makes it sound like:
A. They were okay with Russia meddling in our election, or
B. They were colluding with Russia to meddle in our election.
I guess so.

How can you declare that there was nothing going on if there is an ongoing investigation?

Additionally, there was an ongoing investigation.

I didn't there "IS" and ongoing investigation. I said there "WAS" (past tense) referring to the time frame trump did not say anything to the VP.

Flynn was undercutting Obama who was still the POTUS when he put the sanctions into effect.

Nothing illegal happened. Plus, Obama ran around the world as a candidate meeting with world leaders in 2008. What do you think he was doing? He also sent his ambassador picks to talk with their counterparts before he was sworn in. It happens. PLUS, how did Flyn undercut obama when, according to the leak, he said something to the effect that the sanctions would be discussed later? There is nothing there.

A. They were okay with Russia meddling in our election, or
B. They were colluding with Russia to meddle in our election.

Now you are doing what the media is doing. Conflating two separate issues. The conversation had nothing to do with the elections.