20 Feb 2017 3:35 pm
The little darling has a point, Misty.Huey » 20 Feb 2017 3:23 pm » wrote:
1. Thanks to the emails we have learned that the Hilary and the DNC did more to influence the elections than groups associated with the Russian government did. Yet misty STILL remains silent on the content of the emails and STILL voted for her. Sorry if her faux outrage does not move me.
2. Our own country had been involved in directly and indirectly affecting the outcome of elections for decades most recently under the stewardship of Obama and Clinton. Israel and France come to mind. This is a case of what goes around comes around.
3. and the bonus question that lib/progs ignore is can you explain the difference between an investigative reporter finding a source that is illegally giving information, like Woodward and Beratein, and a group with all ties to a government? The information leaked was valid information.
See, for misty is was ok for Clinton and the DNC to attempt to influence or steal the election. Because that is who she wanted to win.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?