Huey » 02 Mar 2017 3:19 pm » wrote:
Lol! I don't believe a tweeted news report of the sort you use. Anyone with any semblance of intelligence would read Franken's lead up to the question, and how Sessions responded, and understand the question was related to campaign staff or supporters conspiring or colluding with the Russians. That is why he answered as he did. But you propagandists live outside the bounds of honesty. Go ahead, print the entire exchange. You ain't got the integrity to do so.
Common sense based on the question.
Do you have common sense or a semblance of intelligence?
As I said, non story.
Like the media she is cherry picking, just as you are doing with the sessions story.
You still don't have the integrity to post the entire exchange between Frankenstein and Sessions.
Don't bother. I'm not going to argue with you. You are a sycophant. I will just sit back and laugh at the discussion as well as mourn the depths our press, and the dumbing down, of Americans has gone.
Don't worry though. He recused himself from the investigation. Don't think he should have, but he did.